Abdalla Ali I, García-Godoy Franklin
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Egypt.
Am J Dent. 2006 Oct;19(5):289-92.
To evaluate the clinical performance of two self-etching and one total-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).
Two self-etching primers, Clearfil SE Bond and Hybrid Bond, and one total etch adhesive, Admira Bond, were placed in 195 NCCL. Restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 2 years using the USPHS criteria.
No restoration was lost after 1 and 2 years for all materials. There was no significant difference between the baseline and 2-year results for Admira Bond and Clearfil SE Bond restorations. In contrast, Hybrid Bond restorations showed significant deterioration in marginal adaptation and cavosurface marginal discoloration after 2 years. Also, there was no significant difference between Admira Bond and Clearfil SE Bond at each recall period.
评估两种自酸蚀粘结剂和一种全酸蚀粘结剂用于治疗V类非龋性颈部病变（NCCL）的临床性能。
将两种自酸蚀底漆Clearfil SE Bond和Hybrid Bond，以及一种全酸蚀粘结剂Admira Bond应用于195例NCCL患者。使用美国公共卫生署（USPHS）标准在基线、1年和2年时对修复体进行评估。
所有材料在1年和2年后均无修复体脱落。Admira Bond和Clearfil SE Bond修复体在基线和2年结果之间无显著差异。相比之下，Hybrid Bond修复体在2年后边缘适应性和洞缘边缘变色方面出现显著恶化。此外，在每个回访期，Admira Bond和Clearfil SE Bond之间无显著差异。
