Gray Emily, McCambridge Jim, Strang John
National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry (King's College London), 4 Windsor Walk, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Nov-Dec;40(6):535-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh199. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
To test whether a single session of Motivational Interviewing (MI) focussing on drinking alcohol, and cigarette and cannabis smoking, would successfully lead to reductions in use or problems.
Naturalistic quasi-experimental study, in 162 young people (mean age 17 years) who were daily cigarette smokers, weekly drinkers or weekly cannabis smokers, comparing 59 receiving MI with 103 non-intervention assessment-only controls. MI was delivered in a single session by youth workers or by the first author. Assessment was made of changes in self-reported cigarette, alcohol, cannabis use and related indicators of risk and problems between recruitment and after 3 months by self-completion questionnaire.
87% of subjects (141 of 162) were followed up. The most substantial evidence of benefit was achieved in relation to alcohol consumption, with those receiving MI drinking on average two days per month less than controls after 3 months. Weaker evidences of impact on cigarette smoking, and no evidence of impact on cannabis use, were obtained.
Evidence of effectiveness for the delivery of MI by youth workers in routine conditions has been identified. However, the extent of benefit is much more modest than previously identified in efficacy studies.
测试针对饮酒、吸烟和吸食大麻开展的单次动机性访谈(MI)是否能成功减少这些行为或相关问题。
自然主义准实验研究,对162名年轻人(平均年龄17岁)进行研究,这些年轻人每日吸烟、每周饮酒或每周吸食大麻,将59名接受动机性访谈的人与103名仅接受非干预评估的对照者进行比较。动机性访谈由青年工作者或第一作者在单次访谈中进行。通过自我填写问卷评估招募时与3个月后自我报告的吸烟、饮酒、吸食大麻情况以及相关风险和问题指标的变化。
87%的受试者(162名中的141名)接受了随访。在饮酒方面获得了最显著的益处证据,接受动机性访谈的人在3个月后平均每月饮酒天数比对照者少两天。在吸烟方面获得的影响证据较弱,而在吸食大麻方面未获得影响证据。
已确定青年工作者在常规情况下开展动机性访谈的有效性证据。然而,受益程度比之前在疗效研究中确定的要小得多。