• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群组随机对照试验:动机性访谈在普遍性预防中的效果。

Cluster randomised trial of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for universal prevention.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Drugs & Health Behaviour, Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Apr 1;114(2-3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.028. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.028
PMID:21075562
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevention of initiation of tobacco, alcohol and drug use is a major societal challenge, for which the existing research literature is generally disappointing. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of adaptation of Motivational Interviewing (MI) for universal prevention purposes, i.e. to prevent initiation of new substance use among non-users, and to reduce risks among existing users.

METHODS

Cluster randomised trial with 416 students aged 16-19 years old recruited in 12 London Further Education colleges without regard to substance use status. Individualised MI was compared with standard practice classroom-delivered Drug Awareness intervention, both delivered over the course of one lesson. Prevalence, initiation and cessation rates for the 3 target behaviours of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and cannabis use, along with reductions in use and harm indicators after both 3 and 12 months were assessed.

RESULTS

This adaptation of MI was not demonstrated to be effective in either intention-to-treat or sub-group analyses for any outcome. Unexpected lower levels of cannabis initiation and prevalence were found in the Drug Awareness control condition.

CONCLUSIONS

This particular adaptation of MI is ineffective as a universal drug prevention intervention and does not merit further study.

摘要

背景

预防烟草、酒精和药物使用的开始是一个重大的社会挑战,现有研究文献普遍令人失望。本研究旨在测试适应动机访谈(MI)进行普遍性预防的效果,即预防非使用者开始新的物质使用,并降低现有使用者的风险。

方法

在没有考虑物质使用状况的情况下,在伦敦 12 所继续教育学院招募了 416 名 16-19 岁的学生,采用集群随机试验进行。个性化 MI 与标准实践课堂提供的药物意识干预进行比较,两者均在一节课的过程中进行。评估了 3 个目标行为(吸烟、饮酒和大麻使用)的流行率、起始率和终止率,以及在 3 个月和 12 个月后使用和危害指标的减少情况。

结果

在意向治疗或亚组分析中,这种 MI 的适应都没有显示出对任何结果的有效性。在药物意识对照组中,大麻起始和流行率出人意料地较低。

结论

这种特定的 MI 适应作为一种普遍性药物预防干预措施是无效的,不值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Cluster randomised trial of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for universal prevention.群组随机对照试验:动机性访谈在普遍性预防中的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Apr 1;114(2-3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.028. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
2
Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users.针对年轻大麻使用者早期干预,比较动机性访谈与药物信息及建议的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2008 Nov;103(11):1809-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02331.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
3
The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.单次动机性访谈对减少年轻人药物使用及药物相关风险和危害认知的效果:一项多中心整群随机试验的结果
Addiction. 2004 Jan;99(1):39-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x.
4
The effectiveness of motivational interviewing delivered by youth workers in reducing drinking, cigarette and cannabis smoking among young people: quasi-experimental pilot study.青年工作者开展的动机性访谈在减少青少年饮酒、吸烟和吸食大麻方面的效果:准实验性试点研究。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Nov-Dec;40(6):535-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh199. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
5
Deterioration over time in effect of Motivational Interviewing in reducing drug consumption and related risk among young people.随着时间推移,动机性访谈在减少年轻人药物消费及相关风险方面的效果逐渐恶化。
Addiction. 2005 Apr;100(4):470-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01013.x.
6
It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: a qualitative study of advice for young cannabis users.关键不在于你做了什么,而在于你做事的方式:一项针对年轻大麻使用者建议的定性研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 Mar;28(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2008.00033.x.
7
Internet-based prevention for alcohol and cannabis use: final results of the Climate Schools course.基于互联网的预防酒精和大麻使用:气候学校课程的最终结果。
Addiction. 2010 Apr;105(4):749-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02853.x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
8
Fidelity to Motivational Interviewing and subsequent cannabis cessation among adolescents.青少年对动机式访谈的遵从性与随后的大麻戒断。
Addict Behav. 2011 Jul;36(7):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
9
The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-Dap cluster randomized controlled trial.基于学校的药物滥用预防计划的效果:欧盟-Dap 集群随机对照试验的 18 个月随访。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Apr 1;108(1-2):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.018. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
10
Universal Internet-based prevention for alcohol and cannabis use reduces truancy, psychological distress and moral disengagement: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于互联网的酒精和大麻使用通用预防措施可减少逃学、心理困扰和道德脱离:一项整群随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2014 Aug;65:109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
2
Predictors of cannabis use among first-time justice-involved youth: A cohort study.首次涉及司法的青少年中大麻使用的预测因素:一项队列研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108754. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108754. Epub 2021 May 21.
3
Understanding further education as a context for public health intervention: qualitative findings from a study process evaluation.
将继续教育视为公共卫生干预的背景:一项研究过程评估的定性发现。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):610-617. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz059.
4
Examining subgroup effects by socioeconomic status of public health interventions targeting multiple risk behaviour in adolescence.探讨针对青少年多种危险行为的公共卫生干预措施的社会经济地位亚组效应。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6042-0.
5
Hookah Use Among College Students: Recent Use, Knowledge of Health Risks, Attitude and Reasons for Use.大学生水烟使用情况:近期使用情况、对健康风险的认知、态度和使用原因。
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1037-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0519-8.
6
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults.动机性访谈预防青年成人酒精滥用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4.
7
Do brief alcohol interventions reduce tobacco use among adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.简短的酒精干预措施能否减少青少年和年轻人的烟草使用?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;38(6):899-911. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9653-2. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
8
A Systematic Review of School-Based Alcohol and other Drug Prevention Programs.一项关于校内酒精及其他药物预防项目的系统评价
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2015 Feb 26;11(Suppl 1 M6):102-12. doi: 10.2174/1745017901511010102. eCollection 2015.
9
Effectiveness of school-based preventive interventions on adolescent alcohol use: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于学校的预防干预措施对青少年饮酒的有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Dec 13;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-48.
10
Effectiveness of different Web-based interventions to prepare co-smokers of cigarettes and cannabis for double cessation: a three-arm randomized controlled trial.不同基于网络的干预措施对香烟和大麻共同吸烟者进行双重戒烟准备的有效性:一项三臂随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 5;16(12):e273. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3246.