Suppr超能文献

静脉数字减影血管造影术:一种用于实验性动脉瘤成像的替代动脉数字减影血管造影术的方法。

Intra-venous digital subtraction angiography: an alternative method to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for experimental aneurysm imaging.

作者信息

Ding Yong Hong, Dai Daying, Lewis Debra A, Danielson Mark A, Kadirvel Ramanathan, Mandrekar Jayawant N, Cloft Harry J, Kallmes David F

机构信息

Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2005 Oct;47(10):792-5. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1425-1. Epub 2005 Aug 25.

Abstract

Conventional intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA), which necessitates surgical exposure and ligation of the femoral artery, is an invasive and expensive method of evaluation for experimental elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. The purpose of this study was to examine and validate intra-venous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) as an alternative to IADSA by comparing their diagnostic accuracies. We performed both IVDSA and IADSA for 24 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in a rabbit model, 1 month following creation. Aneurysm sizes (neck, width and height) from both the IVDSA and IADSA procedures were evaluated and measured. Comparison of the aneurysm sizes between IVDSA and IADSA were performed with the Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test. All the aneurysms were seen clearly in both the IVDSA and IADSA techniques. Mean sizes of the IVDSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.41 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.61 +/- 0.93 mm and 8.07 +/- 2.11 mm, respectively. Mean sizes of the IADSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.43 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.66 +/- 0.92 mm and 8.16 +/- 2.25 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the sizes of the aneurysm neck, width and height between the two groups (P = 0.311, P = 0.086 and P = 0.258, respectively). IVDSA appears to be an alternative method for evaluating elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits.

摘要

传统的动脉内数字减影血管造影术(IADSA)需要对股动脉进行手术暴露和结扎,是一种用于评估兔实验性弹性蛋白酶诱导动脉瘤的侵入性且昂贵的方法。本研究的目的是通过比较静脉数字减影血管造影术(IVDSA)和IADSA的诊断准确性,来检验和验证IVDSA作为IADSA的替代方法。我们在兔模型中对24个弹性蛋白酶诱导的囊状动脉瘤在造模后1个月同时进行了IVDSA和IADSA检查。对IVDSA和IADSA检查中动脉瘤的大小(颈部、宽度和高度)进行了评估和测量。采用Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验对IVDSA和IADSA之间的动脉瘤大小进行比较。在IVDSA和IADSA技术中所有动脉瘤均清晰可见。IVDSA动脉瘤颈部、宽度和高度的平均大小分别为3.41±0.80mm、3.61±0.93mm和8.07±2.11mm。IADSA动脉瘤颈部、宽度和高度的平均大小分别为3.43±0.80mm、3.66±0.92mm和8.16±2.25mm。两组之间动脉瘤颈部、宽度和高度的大小无显著差异(P分别为0.311、0.086和0.258)。IVDSA似乎是评估兔弹性蛋白酶诱导动脉瘤的一种替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验