Arora J, Malik A C
Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Tyneside General Hospital, 225 Addycombe Terrace, Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 5TY, UK.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Oct;125(8):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0033-1. Epub 2005 Oct 22.
External fixation has been extensively used to treat the intra-articular fractures of the distal radius and it has several distinct advantages over conventional POP cast and plate fixation. However, the limitation of external fixation to achieve articular congruity in the comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal radius has been documented in the literature. This could be because external fixation alone does not expand crushed cancellous bone and cannot work without soft tissue hinges. This prospective study was conducted to look at the results of comminuted, displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius treated exclusively by external fixation.
A 2-year follow-up of 27 patients with comminuted, displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius that were treated exclusively by external fixation is presented. The radiological results, functional results and complications were analyzed according to the scoring system given by Jakim et al.
Anatomical reduction could not be achieved in 12 patients (44%) and reduction was lost in two patients (7%). Excellent and good results were seen in 59.3%, fair results were seen in 22.2% and poor results were seen in 18.5% of the cases. Outcome scores of patients without articular step were significantly better as compared to the patients with articular step at healing. There was a positive correlation between the restoration of normal anatomy (radiological results) and the functional outcome (r=0.775). Overall nine patients (33%) had complications.
We conclude that although the external fixation is reliable in maintaining the reduction in displaced comminuted intra-articular fractures, it is inadequate in restoring articular congruity in many cases. The complications of external fixation are frequent and may be potentially serious in nature.
外固定已广泛应用于治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折,与传统的石膏管型固定和钢板固定相比,它具有几个明显的优势。然而,文献中已记载了外固定在治疗桡骨远端粉碎性关节内骨折时在实现关节面平整方面的局限性。这可能是因为单纯的外固定无法撑开压缩的松质骨,且没有软组织铰链就无法发挥作用。本前瞻性研究旨在观察单纯采用外固定治疗的桡骨远端粉碎性、移位关节内骨折的结果。
对27例单纯采用外固定治疗的桡骨远端粉碎性、移位关节内骨折患者进行了为期2年的随访。根据Jakim等人给出的评分系统分析了影像学结果、功能结果及并发症情况。
12例患者(44%)未能实现解剖复位,2例患者(7%)出现复位丢失。59.3%的病例结果为优或良,22.2%为尚可,18.5%为差。愈合时无关节台阶的患者的结果评分显著优于有关节台阶的患者。正常解剖结构的恢复(影像学结果)与功能结果之间存在正相关(r = 0.775)。总体上有9例患者(33%)出现并发症。
我们得出结论,尽管外固定在维持移位粉碎性关节内骨折的复位方面可靠,但在许多情况下,它在恢复关节面平整方面并不充分。外固定的并发症很常见,且可能具有潜在的严重性。