• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IB期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的风险分组

Risk grouping in stage IB squamous cell cervical carcinoma.

作者信息

Van de Putte Gregg, Lie A Kathrine, Vach Werner, Baekelandt Mark, Kristensen Gunnar B

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Oct;99(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.026
PMID:16137752
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) prognostic criteria (based on stromal invasion, tumor size and vascular invasion) for early squamous cervical carcinoma (SCC) in an independent population and to evaluate the prognostic value of a simpler model.

METHODS

We studied 221 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy for stage IB SCC between 1987 and 1993. Adjuvant treatment consisting of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy was given in case of large tumor size, positive lymph nodes or invasion into the parametria. Histological slides from all patients were reviewed by one pathologist.

RESULTS

The GOG criteria divided the patients from our population in a small low risk group (3-year relapse-free rate (RFR) of 100%), a small high risk group (RFR of 57%) and a bigger intermediate risk group (RFR of 80-90%). These results are in good agreement with those of the original publication. A risk model based on 2 of the 3 factors used by the GOG may perform as well as the 3-factor model, especially when allowing interaction. Tumors measuring >2 cm and invading into the outer third of the cervical wall had a 5-year DFS of 56% compared to 93% for tumors measuring < or =2 cm or invading to less then the outer third of the cervical wall.

CONCLUSION

The GOG criteria could be validated in this independent population. A model based on 2 of the 3 factors may perform as good.

摘要

目的

在一个独立人群中检验妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)针对早期宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的预后标准(基于间质浸润、肿瘤大小和血管浸润),并评估一个更简单模型的预后价值。

方法

我们研究了1987年至1​​993年间因IB期SCC接受根治性子宫切除术和双侧淋巴结清扫术的221例患者。对于肿瘤体积大、淋巴结阳性或侵犯子宫旁组织的患者,给予放疗和/或化疗的辅助治疗。所有患者的组织学切片由一名病理学家复查。

结果

GOG标准将我们人群中的患者分为一个小的低风险组(3年无复发生存率(RFR)为100%)、一个小的高风险组(RFR为57%)和一个较大的中度风险组(RFR为80 - 90%)。这些结果与原始出版物的结果高度一致。基于GOG使用的3个因素中的2个的风险模型可能与3因素模型表现一样好,特别是在允许相互作用的情况下。直径>2 cm且侵犯宫颈壁外三分之一的肿瘤5年无病生存率(DFS)为56%,而直径≤2 cm或侵犯宫颈壁不到外三分之一的肿瘤为93%。

结论

GOG标准可在这个独立人群中得到验证。基于3个因素中的2个的模型可能表现同样良好。

相似文献

1
Risk grouping in stage IB squamous cell cervical carcinoma.IB期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的风险分组
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Oct;99(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.026.
2
A validation study of new risk grouping criteria for postoperative treatment in stage IB cervical cancers without high-risk factors: rethinking the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria.一项针对无高危因素的 IB 期宫颈癌术后治疗新风险分组标准的验证研究:重新思考妇科肿瘤学组标准。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Nov;147(1):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.013. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
3
Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy.早期宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术后预后因素及结局的多因素分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 May;93(2):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.026.
4
Treatment results of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy for intermediate- and high-risk stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.中高危IB-IIA期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后辅助化疗的治疗结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.019. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
5
Risk stratification of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated by radiotherapy alone.单纯放疗治疗晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者的风险分层
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):492-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.012.
6
Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy.影响早期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除及术后辅助治疗结局的预后因素。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Mar;17(2):174-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00831.x.
7
Rethinking the use of radiation and chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy: a clinical-pathologic analysis of a Gynecologic Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial.根治性子宫切除术后放疗与化疗应用的再思考:一项妇科肿瘤学组/西南肿瘤学组/放射治疗肿瘤学组试验的临床病理分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.007.
8
Early stage cervical cancer: adjuvant treatment in negative lymph node cases.早期宫颈癌:淋巴结阴性病例的辅助治疗
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
9
Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis.伴有盆腔淋巴结转移的子宫颈Ib1期腺鳞癌患者预后较差。
Kobe J Med Sci. 2006;52(1-2):9-15.
10
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk factors.高危因素子宫颈癌患者同步放化疗后序贯辅助化疗
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jan;104(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of boost radiation therapy after hysterectomy on cervical cancer patients with close or positive resection margins.子宫切除术切缘接近或阳性的宫颈癌患者术后辅助放疗的影响。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Mar;26(3):689-697. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03283-6. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Surgically treated cervical cancer in a high-risk group in the era of the 2018 FIGO staging schema: a nationwide study.2018 年 FIGO 分期方案时代高风险人群中手术治疗的宫颈癌:一项全国性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):12020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39014-8.
3
Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.
辅助性盆腔放疗与观察在原发性根治术后中危早期宫颈癌患者中的比较:倾向评分调整分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;34(4):e42. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e42. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
A novel Silva pattern-based model for precisely predicting recurrence in intermediate-risk cervical adenocarcinoma patients.一种基于 Silva 模式的新型模型,可精确预测中危型宫颈腺癌患者的复发情况。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01971-z.
5
Useful MRI Findings for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创手术的有用MRI表现。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;13(16):4078. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164078.
6
The clinical and prognostic implication of deep stromal invasion in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy.根治性子宫切除术后宫颈癌患者深部基质浸润的临床及预后意义。
J Cancer. 2020 Oct 23;11(24):7368-7377. doi: 10.7150/jca.50752. eCollection 2020.
7
Prognostic Assessment of Cervical Cancer Patients by Clinical Staging and Surgical-Pathological Factor: A Support Vector Machine-Based Approach.基于临床分期和手术病理因素的宫颈癌患者预后评估:一种基于支持向量机的方法
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 5;10:1353. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01353. eCollection 2020.
8
Prognostic Value and Potential Role of Alternative mRNA Splicing Events in Cervical Cancer.可变mRNA剪接事件在宫颈癌中的预后价值及潜在作用
Front Genet. 2020 Jul 10;11:726. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00726. eCollection 2020.
9
Chemoradiotherapy is not superior to radiotherapy alone after radical surgery for cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factor.根治性手术后,中危因素宫颈癌患者采用放化疗并不优于单纯放疗。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;31(3):e35. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e35. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Prognostic Model for Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).早期宫颈癌患者生存和复发的预后模型:韩国妇科肿瘤学组研究(KGOG 1028)。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):320-333. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.124. Epub 2019 Aug 5.