Suppr超能文献

轻度至中度重症社区获得性肺炎的家庭管理:一项随机对照试验。

Home management of mild to moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Richards Dee A, Toop Les J, Epton Michael J, McGeoch Graham R B, Town G Ian, Wynn-Thomas Simon M H, Dawson Robin D, Hlavac Michael C, Werno Anja M, Abernethy Paul D

机构信息

Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2005 Sep 5;183(5):235-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07026.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether community management of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is as effective and acceptable as standard hospital management of CAP.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Christchurch, New Zealand, primary and secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

55 patients presenting or referred to the emergency department at Christchurch Hospital with mild to moderately severe pneumonia, assessed using a validated pneumonia severity assessment score, from July 2002 to October 2003.

INTERVENTIONS

Hospital treatment as usual or comprehensive care in the home delivered by primary care teams.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: days to discharge, days on intravenous (IV) antibiotics, patient-rated symptom scores. Secondary: health status measured using level of functioning at 2 and 6 weeks, patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The median number of days to discharge was higher in the home care group (4 days; range, 1-14) than in the hospital groups (2 days; range, 0-10; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the number of days on IV antibiotics or on subsequent oral antibiotics. Patient-rated symptom scores at 2 and 6 weeks, median change in symptom severity from baseline to 6 weeks, and general functioning at 2 and 6 weeks did not differ between the groups. Patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment, with a clear preference for community treatment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild to moderately severe CAP can be managed effectively in the community by primary care teams. This model of comprehensive care at home can be implemented by primary care teams with suitable funding structures.

摘要

目的

确定轻度至中度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的社区管理是否与CAP的标准医院管理一样有效且可接受。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

新西兰克赖斯特彻奇的初级和二级医疗保健机构。

参与者

2002年7月至2003年10月期间,55例因轻度至中度严重肺炎到克赖斯特彻奇医院急诊科就诊或转诊的患者,使用经过验证的肺炎严重程度评估评分进行评估。

干预措施

常规医院治疗或由初级保健团队提供的家庭综合护理。

主要结局指标

主要指标:出院天数、静脉注射(IV)抗生素使用天数、患者自评症状评分。次要指标:在2周和6周时使用功能水平测量的健康状况、患者满意度。

结果

家庭护理组的中位出院天数(4天;范围1 - 14天)高于医院组(2天;范围0 - 10天;P = 0.004)。静脉注射抗生素或后续口服抗生素的使用天数没有差异。两组在2周和6周时患者自评症状评分、从基线到6周症状严重程度的中位变化以及2周和6周时的总体功能没有差异。两组患者对治疗都很满意,明显更倾向于社区治疗(P < 0.001)。

结论

初级保健团队可在社区有效管理轻度至中度严重的CAP。这种家庭综合护理模式可由具备适当资金结构的初级保健团队实施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验