Mohr David C, Hart Stacey L, Julian Laura, Catledge Claudine, Honos-Webb Lara, Vella Lea, Tasch Edwin T
Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco 94121, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):1007-14. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.1007.
Several studies have shown that telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) is superior to forms of no treatment controls. No study has examined if the skills-training component to T-CBT provides any benefit beyond that provided by nonspecific factors.
To test the efficacy of a 16-week T-CBT against a strong control for attention and nonspecific therapy effects.
Randomized controlled trial including 12-month follow-up.
Telephone administration of psychotherapy with patients in their homes.
Participants had depression and functional impairments due to multiple sclerosis.
A 16-week T-CBT program was compared with 16 weeks of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder, Beck Depression Inventory score, and Positive Affect scale score of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale.
Of the 127 participants randomized, 7 (5.5%) dropped out of treatment. There were significant improvement during treatment on all outcome measures (P<.01 for all) and an increase in Positive Affect Scale score. Improvements over 16 weeks of treatment were significantly greater for T-CBT, compared with telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy, for major depressive disorder frequency (P = .02), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (P = .02), and Positive Affect Scale score (P = .008), but not for the Beck Depression Inventory score (P = .29). Treatment gains were maintained during 12-month follow-up; however, differences across treatments were no longer evident (P > .16 for all).
Patients showed significant improvements in depression and positive affect during the 16 weeks of telephone-administered treatment. The specific cognitive-behavioral components of T-CBT produced improvements above and beyond the nonspecific effects of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy on evaluator-rated measures of depression and self-reported positive affect. Attrition was low.
多项研究表明,电话认知行为疗法(T-CBT)优于无治疗对照形式。尚无研究探讨T-CBT的技能训练部分是否能带来超出非特异性因素的益处。
针对注意力及非特异性治疗效果的有力对照,检验为期16周的T-CBT的疗效。
包含12个月随访的随机对照试验。
通过电话在家中对患者进行心理治疗。
患有因多发性硬化症导致的抑郁症和功能障碍的患者。
将为期16周的T-CBT项目与为期16周的电话支持性情感聚焦疗法进行比较。
汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分、用于DSM-IV诊断重度抑郁症的结构化临床访谈、贝克抑郁量表评分以及正负性情绪量表的正性情绪量表评分。
在127名随机分组的参与者中,7名(5.5%)退出治疗。治疗期间所有结局指标均有显著改善(所有P<0.01),且正性情绪量表评分增加。对于重度抑郁症发生率(P = 0.02)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分(P = 0.02)和正性情绪量表评分(P = 0.008),T-CBT在16周治疗期间的改善显著大于电话支持性情感聚焦疗法,但贝克抑郁量表评分方面差异不显著(P = 0.29)。治疗效果在12个月随访期间得以维持;然而,各治疗组之间的差异不再明显(所有P>0.16)。
在为期16周的电话治疗期间,患者的抑郁症状和正性情绪有显著改善。T-CBT的特定认知行为成分在评估者评定的抑郁测量指标和自我报告的正性情绪方面,产生了超出电话支持性情感聚焦疗法非特异性效果的改善。损耗率较低。