Suppr超能文献

与核心脂多糖免疫球蛋白相比,对术后感染高危患者预防性静脉注射标准免疫球蛋白。

Prophylactic intravenous administration of standard immune globulin as compared with core-lipopolysaccharide immune globulin in patients at high risk of postsurgical infection.

作者信息

Cometta Alain, Baumgartner Jean-Daniel, Lee Martin L, Hanique Geneviève, Glauser Michel-Pierre

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):234-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270404.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infections and their sequelae are a major cause of death among patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Studies of passive immunotherapy with standard intravenous immune globulin and hyperimmune globulin directed against gram-negative core lipopolysaccharide to prevent gram-negative infections and their serious systemic complications have had equivocal results in such patients.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind study to assess the efficacy of standard immune globulin and core-lipopolysaccharide hyperimmune globulin in preventing infections in surgical patients at high risk. The patients received standard immune globulin (400 mg per kilogram of body weight), hyperimmune globulin (400 mg per kilogram), or placebo (25 percent albumin, 8 ml per kilogram) weekly, for a maximum of four doses while in the ICU.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients were enrolled, and 329 could be evaluated. The number of patients in whom infections developed was significantly lower in the group receiving standard immune globulin than in the placebo group (36 of 109 vs. 53 of 112 patients, P = 0.03), as was the incidence of pneumonia (15 vs. 30 cases, P = 0.04), especially pneumonia due to gram-negative bacteria (5 vs. 16 cases, P = 0.02). The number of days spent in the ICU and the total days spent in the hospital were lower in the standard immune globulin group (medians of 2 and 7.5 days fewer; P = 0.02 and 0.06, respectively). In contrast, the hyperimmune globulin had no detectable prophylactic effect on infections (50 of 108 patients, with 25 cases of pneumonia). The rate of systemic infections and shock was similar in the three study groups, and hospital mortality did not differ significantly among them.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immune globulin given prophylactically to selected high-risk patients in the surgical ICU can reduce the incidence of infection. Core-lipopolysaccharide hyperimmune globulin is not effective in preventing gram-negative infections and their systemic complications.

摘要

背景

感染及其后遗症是外科重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者死亡的主要原因。使用标准静脉注射免疫球蛋白和针对革兰氏阴性菌核心脂多糖的高免疫球蛋白进行被动免疫治疗以预防革兰氏阴性菌感染及其严重全身并发症的研究,在这类患者中的结果并不明确。

方法

我们进行了一项双盲研究,以评估标准免疫球蛋白和核心脂多糖高免疫球蛋白对高危外科患者预防感染的疗效。患者每周接受标准免疫球蛋白(每千克体重400毫克)、高免疫球蛋白(每千克体重400毫克)或安慰剂(25%白蛋白,每千克体重8毫升),在ICU期间最多注射四剂。

结果

共纳入352例患者,其中329例可进行评估。接受标准免疫球蛋白治疗的组中发生感染的患者数量显著低于安慰剂组(109例中的36例对112例中的53例,P = 0.03),肺炎发生率也是如此(15例对30例,P = 0.04),尤其是革兰氏阴性菌引起的肺炎(5例对16例,P = 0.02)。标准免疫球蛋白组在ICU的住院天数和总住院天数均较短(中位数分别少2天和7.5天;P分别为0.02和0.06)。相比之下,高免疫球蛋白对感染没有可检测到的预防作用(108例患者中有50例,其中25例发生肺炎)。三个研究组的全身感染和休克发生率相似,医院死亡率在各组之间无显著差异。

结论

对外科ICU中选定的高危患者进行预防性静脉注射免疫球蛋白可降低感染发生率。核心脂多糖高免疫球蛋白在预防革兰氏阴性菌感染及其全身并发症方面无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验