Griffiths C J, Harding C, Blake C, McIntosh S, Drinnan M J, Robson W A, Abrams P, Ramsden P D, Pickard R S
Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1323-6; discussion 1326; author reply 1326. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173637.07357.9e.
Bladder pressure during voiding can be estimated by a noninvasive technique using controlled inflation of a penile cuff. This test provides a valid and reliable estimate of isovolumetric bladder pressure but to our knowledge the role of the test for the routine clinical treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) has yet to be demonstrated. As a first step, we evaluated a proposed nomogram for the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men with LUTS using noninvasive measurements of pressure and flow.
Using a combination of theoretical calculation and experimental data the existing International Continence Society pressure flow nomogram was modified to allow noninvasive measurement of isovolumetric bladder pressure in place of detrusor pressure at maximum urine flow. Accuracy of the nomogram for classifying obstruction was then tested in a group of 144 men with LUTS who underwent an invasive and a noninvasive pressure flow study.
The modified nomogram identified men with obstruction with 68% positive predictive value and 78% negative predictive value. Predictive accuracy could be improved by adding an additional criterion of obstruction, that is maximum urine flow less than 10 ml second, whereby an identifiable 69% of all cases could be classified as obstructed (88% positive predictive value) or not obstructed (86% negative predictive value). In the remaining 31% of patients invasive pressure flow studies would provide additional information, although some results would remain equivocal.
The proposed nomogram combined with the additional flow rate criterion can classify more than two-thirds of cases without recourse to invasive pressure flow studies. We must now evaluate the usefulness of this classification for the treatment of men with LUTS.
通过使用阴茎袖带控制性充气的非侵入性技术,可以估计排尿期间的膀胱压力。该测试可有效且可靠地估计等容膀胱压力,但据我们所知,该测试在常规临床治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)患者中的作用尚未得到证实。作为第一步,我们使用压力和流量的非侵入性测量方法,评估了一种用于诊断LUTS男性膀胱出口梗阻的拟用列线图。
结合理论计算和实验数据,对现有的国际尿失禁学会压力-流量列线图进行修改,以允许使用等容膀胱压力的非侵入性测量来替代最大尿流时的逼尿肌压力。然后在一组144名接受侵入性和非侵入性压力-流量研究的LUTS男性中测试该列线图对梗阻分类的准确性。
修改后的列线图识别出梗阻男性的阳性预测值为68%,阴性预测值为78%。通过添加另一个梗阻标准,即最大尿流小于10毫升/秒,可提高预测准确性,据此可将所有病例中的69%明确分类为梗阻(阳性预测值88%)或无梗阻(阴性预测值86%)。在其余31%的患者中,侵入性压力-流量研究将提供更多信息,尽管有些结果仍不明确。
拟用列线图结合额外的流速标准,无需进行侵入性压力-流量研究即可对超过三分之二的病例进行分类。我们现在必须评估这种分类对LUTS男性治疗的有用性。