• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逼尿肌收缩持续时间作为膀胱出口梗阻的尿动力学参数用于评估下尿路症状的男性患者。

Detrusor contraction duration as a urodynamic parameter of bladder outlet obstruction for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

作者信息

Ameda K, Steele G S, Sullivan M P, Stember D, Yalla S V

机构信息

Division of Urology, Brockton/West Roxbury Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):482-6.

PMID:9679903
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent studies suggest that detrusor contraction duration increases with bladder outlet obstruction and correlates with the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index. Since the detrusor contraction duration may also depend on detrusor contractility and bladder volume, its use alone in characterizing bladder outlet obstruction is debatable. Therefore, we studied the relationship between detrusor contraction duration and bladder outlet obstruction, bladder capacity, detrusor contractility and symptoms to determine whether detrusor contraction duration is a useful parameter for characterizing bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pressure-flow studies were performed in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Bladder outlet obstruction was defined as passive urethral resistance relation greater than grade II and contractility was determined from Schäfer's nomogram. Detrusor contraction duration was defined as the contraction time elapsed between the first rise in detrusor pressure from baseline to the time at which detrusor pressure returned to baseline at the end of voiding. AUA symptom index was attained from each patient and categorized as mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19) and severe (20 to 35).

RESULTS

Detrusor contraction duration was determined from 58 consecutive pressure-flow studies. This parameter was not significantly different among 23 patients with mild (116.7+/-34.0 seconds), 15 with moderate (102.7+/-61.9 seconds) and 9 with severe (89.2+/-44.4 seconds) AUA symptom index scores. AUA symptom index, as well as irritative and obstructive scores did not significantly correlate with detrusor contraction duration. Detrusor pressure at maximal flow was weakly correlated with detrusor contraction duration (r=0.322, p=0.014). However, detrusor contraction duration in 27 obstructed patients (111.6+/-53.7 seconds) was not significantly different from that of 31 nonobstructed patients (91.5+/-41.5 seconds) and it did not increase with the severity of bladder outlet obstruction. Detrusor contraction duration in 40 patients with good contractility (94.3+/-49.2 seconds) was significantly lower than in 18 patients with poor contractility (115.5+/-43.3 seconds). Detrusor contraction duration was significantly lower in nonobstructed patients with good contractility (72.0+/-21.7 seconds) compared with either nonobstructed patients with poor contractility (118.4+/-47.7 seconds) or obstructed patients with good contractility (112.5+/-58.0 seconds). There was no difference in detrusor contraction duration between nonobstructed patients with poor contractility and obstructed patients with good contractility. Multiple regression analysis showed that detrusor contraction duration can be best predicted by a combination of detrusor pressure at maximal flow, bladder capacity and contractility (r=0.576).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that detrusor contraction duration cannot distinguish patients with from those without bladder outlet obstruction, and it does not correlate with the severity of symptoms. Since our results also showed that detrusor contraction duration depends on several factors related to detrusor and outlet function, it cannot be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction.

摘要

目的

近期研究表明,逼尿肌收缩持续时间随膀胱出口梗阻而增加,且与美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)症状指数相关。由于逼尿肌收缩持续时间可能还取决于逼尿肌收缩力和膀胱容量,因此仅用其来表征膀胱出口梗阻存在争议。因此,我们研究了逼尿肌收缩持续时间与膀胱出口梗阻、膀胱容量、逼尿肌收缩力及症状之间的关系,以确定逼尿肌收缩持续时间是否是表征下尿路症状男性膀胱出口梗阻的有用参数。

材料与方法

对有下尿路症状的男性进行压力 - 流率研究。膀胱出口梗阻定义为被动尿道阻力关系大于Ⅱ级,收缩力根据施费尔列线图确定。逼尿肌收缩持续时间定义为从逼尿肌压力从基线首次上升到排尿结束时逼尿肌压力恢复到基线的收缩时间。从每位患者处获取AUA症状指数,并分为轻度(0至7)、中度(8至19)和重度(20至35)。

结果

从58项连续的压力 - 流率研究中确定了逼尿肌收缩持续时间。该参数在23例AUA症状指数评分为轻度(116.7±34.0秒)、15例中度(102.7±61.9秒)和9例重度(89.2±44.4秒)的患者中无显著差异。AUA症状指数以及刺激症状和梗阻症状评分与逼尿肌收缩持续时间均无显著相关性。最大尿流率时的逼尿肌压力与逼尿肌收缩持续时间呈弱相关(r = 0.322,p = 0.014)。然而,27例梗阻患者的逼尿肌收缩持续时间(111.6±53.7秒)与31例非梗阻患者的逼尿肌收缩持续时间(91.5±41.5秒)无显著差异,且未随膀胱出口梗阻的严重程度增加。40例收缩力良好患者的逼尿肌收缩持续时间(94.3±49.2秒)显著低于18例收缩力较差患者的逼尿肌收缩持续时间(115.5±43.3秒)。与收缩力较差的非梗阻患者(118.4±47.7秒)或收缩力良好的梗阻患者(112.5±58.0秒)相比,收缩力良好的非梗阻患者的逼尿肌收缩持续时间显著更低。收缩力较差的非梗阻患者与收缩力良好的梗阻患者之间的逼尿肌收缩持续时间无差异。多元回归分析表明,最大尿流率时的逼尿肌压力、膀胱容量和收缩力的组合能最好地预测逼尿肌收缩持续时间(r = 0.576)。

结论

我们的研究表明,逼尿肌收缩持续时间无法区分有无膀胱出口梗阻的患者,且与症状严重程度无关。由于我们的结果还表明逼尿肌收缩持续时间取决于与逼尿肌和出口功能相关的几个因素,因此它不能用作诊断膀胱出口梗阻的可靠参数。

相似文献

1
Detrusor contraction duration as a urodynamic parameter of bladder outlet obstruction for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms.逼尿肌收缩持续时间作为膀胱出口梗阻的尿动力学参数用于评估下尿路症状的男性患者。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):482-6.
2
Significant correlation of the American Urological Association symptom score and a novel urodynamic parameter: detrusor contraction duration.美国泌尿外科学会症状评分与一个新的尿动力学参数:逼尿肌收缩持续时间之间存在显著相关性。
J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1668-72.
3
Lower urinary tract symptoms in young men: videourodynamic findings and correlation with noninvasive measures.年轻男性的下尿路症状:视频尿动力学检查结果及其与非侵入性检查的相关性
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):135-8.
4
Lack of correlation of the American Urological Association Symptom 7 Index with urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction.美国泌尿外科学会症状指数7与尿动力学膀胱出口梗阻之间缺乏相关性。
Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15(5):447-56; discussion 457. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:5<447::AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-F.
5
Analysis of maximum detrusor contraction power in relation to bladder emptying in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement.下尿路症状和良性前列腺增生患者最大逼尿肌收缩力与膀胱排空关系的分析
J Urol. 1995 Dec;154(6):2137-42.
6
Urodynamic characterization of nonobstructive voiding dysfunction in symptomatic elderly men.有症状老年男性非梗阻性排尿功能障碍的尿动力学特征
J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):142-6. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00035.
7
Detrusor contractility and compliance characteristics in adult male patients with obstructive and nonobstructive voiding dysfunction.成年男性梗阻性和非梗阻性排尿功能障碍患者的逼尿肌收缩力和顺应性特征
J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1995-2000.
8
Prediction of prostatic obstruction with a combination of isometric detrusor contraction pressure and maximum urinary flow rate.结合等长逼尿肌收缩压和最大尿流率预测前列腺梗阻
Urology. 1996 Nov;48(5):723-9; discussion 729-30. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00420-7.
9
Value of routine evaluation of the voiding phase when performing urodynamic testing in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.对有下尿路症状的女性进行尿动力学检查时,排尿期常规评估的价值。
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1614-8.
10
The significance of the American Urological Association symptom index score in the evaluation of women with bladder outlet obstruction.美国泌尿外科学会症状指数评分在评估女性膀胱出口梗阻中的意义。
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):207-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient characteristics, symptoms, and urodynamic parameters associated with detrusor contraction duration in women.与女性逼尿肌收缩持续时间相关的患者特征、症状及尿动力学参数。
Front Urol. 2023 May 25;3:1173506. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1173506. eCollection 2023.
2
Exploring the characteristics of detrusor after contraction in females with pure urodynamic stress incontinence.探索单纯性尿动力学压力性尿失禁女性逼尿肌收缩后的特征。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01691-0.
3
Detrusor contraction duration and strength in the patients with benign prostatic enlargement.
良性前列腺增生患者逼尿肌收缩持续时间及强度
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2004 Feb;4(1):29-33. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3457.
4
Current concepts and controversies in urodynamics.尿动力学的当前概念与争议
Curr Urol Rep. 2000 Oct;1(3):217-26. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0022-4.