Antonio Minore, Loris Cacciatore, Silvia Secco, Mauro Gacci, Herrmann Thomas R W, Cosimo De Nunzio, Wayne Kuang, Nicolas Cornu Jean, Luca Cindolo
Department of Urology, Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 26;43(1):395. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05777-0.
Introduction Assessing male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign outlet obstruction (BOO) remains a challenge in urology due to the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods, which are often invasive, time-consuming, and inefficient. Objective Given these limitations, this review explores emerging non-conventional diagnostic approaches for evaluating benign male LUTS. Methods: A broad literature search was performed in November 2024 regarding the assessment of male LUTS exploiting tools different than UDS. The search strategy was implemented across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.Results Ultrasonography, along with surrogate diagnostic methods such as detrusor wall thickness and intravesical prostatic protrusion, remains a key tool in the outpatient setting. Additionally, alternative methods, including near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), condom catheter testing, and penile cuff pressure analysis, are being investigated with the latter, showing potential as a non-invasive alternative to urodynamics, pending further future validations. Biomarkers, such as PSA, adiponectin, neural growth factor and miRNA are gaining interest in the scientific community as additional diagnostic frameworks to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, advancements in computational modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) are poised to revolutionize LUTS diagnostics. Computational modeling, though still in its early stages, offers valuable insights into anatomical and flow dynamics, providing objective parameters for assessing obstruction severity and the need for surgical intervention. Although it has not yet integrated in the current clinical practice, AI, in particular, may offer the potential to integrate diverse data sources, including diagnostic tests and patient-reported symptoms, to create more reliable predictive models for bladder outlet obstruction. Conclusion Given the rapid development and the large economic interest of machine learning, it is expected to play a pivotal role in the future of LUTS assessment, offering faster and more accurate diagnostic tools.
引言 由于传统诊断方法存在局限性,这些方法往往具有侵入性、耗时且效率低下,因此评估因良性出口梗阻(BOO)导致的男性下尿路症状(LUTS)仍然是泌尿外科的一项挑战。目的 鉴于这些局限性,本综述探讨了用于评估男性良性LUTS的新兴非常规诊断方法。方法:2024年11月进行了广泛的文献检索,涉及利用不同于尿动力学检查(UDS)的工具评估男性LUTS。检索策略在Scopus、PubMed和科学网中实施。结果 超声检查以及诸如逼尿肌壁厚度和膀胱内前列腺突出等替代诊断方法,仍然是门诊环境中的关键工具。此外,包括近红外光谱法(NIRS)、避孕套导管测试和阴茎袖带压力分析在内的替代方法正在研究中,后者显示出作为尿动力学检查的非侵入性替代方法的潜力,有待进一步验证。生物标志物,如前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、脂联素、神经生长因子和微小RNA(miRNA)作为提高诊断准确性的额外诊断框架,正引起科学界的关注。此外,计算建模和人工智能(AI)的进展有望彻底改变LUTS的诊断。计算建模虽然仍处于早期阶段,但能提供有关解剖结构和血流动力学的有价值见解,为评估梗阻严重程度和手术干预需求提供客观参数。虽然AI尚未融入当前临床实践,但特别是AI可能有潜力整合包括诊断测试和患者报告症状在内的各种数据源,以创建更可靠的膀胱出口梗阻预测模型。结论 鉴于机器学习的快速发展和巨大的经济利益,预计它将在LUTS评估的未来发挥关键作用,提供更快、更准确的诊断工具。