Sundarathiti Petchara, Pasutharnchat Koravee, Kongdan Youwanush, Suranutkarin Pet-eng
Department of Anesthesiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Apr;88(4):513-20.
Breast cancer is the 2nd most common tumors in Thai women. Until now, oncologic breast surgeries are typically performed by general anesthesia (GA). However, GA cannot provide adequate postoperative pain control and routine use of parenteral opioids aggravate postoperative sedation, nausea, emesis, impaired oxygenation and depressed ventilation. Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) is one of the regional anesthetic techniques that can be done by using a low dose of local anesthetic in combination with ipsilateral brachial plexus block (BPB) for axillary node dissection. TEA can provide a better pain relief without potential paralysis of respiratory muscle and sedation.
Fifty ASA PS I-III patients undergoing MRM were randomly assigned to two study groups of 25 patients each. In the TEA group, an epidural catheter was inserted at T4 to T5, and 10-15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected, then interscalene BPB was done with 8 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine. Anesthesia was maintained with 5-10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine per hour. GA was induced with 1 microg/kg of fentanyl followed by 1.5-2 mg/kg of propofol and was maintained with sevoflurane and 70% N2O in oxygen. The authors evaluated the adequacy of anesthesia, surgical condition, postanesthetic recovery, postanesthetic analgesia and patients' satisfaction.
The demographic data was similar in both groups. The number of patients immediately arrived at PACU with a sedation score of 1 was significantly greater in TEA group (p = 0.003) while the number of patients with an Aldrete score of 10 was greater but not statistically significant (p = 0.25). The verbal rating scale and analgesic requirement were significantly lower in the TEA group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Patients' satisfaction was greater with TEA than with GA (p = 0.014). Surgical condition was similar in both groups.
The present study shows that TEA combined with BPB by using a low dose of 0.2% ropivacaine is a safe and reliable alternative technique for MRM. It can provide not only effective anesthesia but also better postoperative pain relief faster anesthetic recovery and greater patient satisfaction than those of the GA technique.
乳腺癌是泰国女性中第二常见的肿瘤。到目前为止,乳腺癌肿瘤手术通常采用全身麻醉(GA)。然而,全身麻醉不能提供足够的术后疼痛控制,并且胃肠外阿片类药物的常规使用会加重术后镇静、恶心、呕吐、氧合受损和通气抑制。胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)是一种区域麻醉技术,可通过使用低剂量局部麻醉药联合同侧臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)进行腋窝淋巴结清扫。胸段硬膜外麻醉可以提供更好的疼痛缓解,而不会导致呼吸肌麻痹和镇静。
50例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I-III级且接受改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的患者被随机分为两个研究组,每组25例。在胸段硬膜外麻醉组,于T4至T5置入硬膜外导管,注入10-15ml 0.2%罗哌卡因,然后用8ml 0.2%罗哌卡因进行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞。每小时用5-10ml 0.2%罗哌卡因维持麻醉。全身麻醉诱导采用1μg/kg芬太尼,随后给予1.5-2mg/kg丙泊酚,并以七氟醚和70%氧化亚氮与氧气混合维持。作者评估了麻醉效果、手术条件、麻醉后恢复、麻醉后镇痛及患者满意度。
两组的人口统计学数据相似。胸段硬膜外麻醉组术后立即到达麻醉后恢复室(PACU)且镇静评分为1分的患者数量显著更多(p = 0.003),而Aldrete评分为10分的患者数量更多,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.25)。胸段硬膜外麻醉组的视觉模拟评分和镇痛需求显著更低(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.002)。患者对胸段硬膜外麻醉的满意度高于全身麻醉(p = 0.014)。两组的手术条件相似。
本研究表明,采用低剂量0.2%罗哌卡因的胸段硬膜外麻醉联合臂丛神经阻滞是改良根治性乳房切除术的一种安全可靠的替代技术。与全身麻醉技术相比,它不仅能提供有效的麻醉,还能更好地缓解术后疼痛、更快地恢复麻醉并提高患者满意度。