Suppr超能文献

0.2%罗哌卡因持续胸段硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉用于改良根治性乳房切除术围手术期管理的比较

Continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia with 0.2% ropivacaine versus general anesthesia for perioperative management of modified radical mastectomy.

作者信息

Doss N W, Ipe J, Crimi T, Rajpal S, Cohen S, Fogler R J, Michael R, Gintautas J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11212, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2001 Jun;92(6):1552-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200106000-00041.

Abstract

We evaluated in this prospective study the effectiveness of continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine and compared it with general anesthesia (GA) and opioids for pain relief, side effects, postanesthesia recovery, and hospital discharge after modified radical mastectomy. Sixty ASA physical status II and III patients undergoing mastectomy were randomly assigned to two study groups of 30 patients each. In the TEA group, an epidural catheter was inserted at T6-7, and 5--10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected to maintain anesthesia and to continuously administer adequate analgesia for 48 h. GA was induced with IV 1--2 mg of midazolam or 50--100 microg/mL of fentanyl followed by 50--150 mg of propofol and was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% N(2)O in oxygen. The Aldrete score system was used to evaluate postanesthesia recovery, a verbal rating scale was used for assessment of pain intensity, and a postanesthesia discharge scoring system was used for discharge home. The demographic data and side effects (except for nausea and vomiting) (GA 43%, TEA 10%, P = 0.0074) and discharge home were similar in both groups. However, the number of patients ready for discharge from the recovery room during the first postanesthesia hour (Aldrete score of 10) was significantly larger after TEA (80%) than after GA (33%) (P = 0.0006). GA patients experienced significantly more (P < 0.001) substantial pain than TEA patients on Day 0 (70%), Day 1 (53%), and Day 2 (27%) after the surgery. Patient satisfaction was greater with TEA (70%) than with GA (30%) (P < 0.001). We conclude that TEA with ropivacaine provides better postoperative pain relief and less nausea and vomiting, facilitates postanesthesia recovery, and gives greater patient satisfaction than GA.

摘要

在这项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了连续胸椎硬膜外麻醉(TEA)及使用罗哌卡因进行术后镇痛的效果,并将其与全身麻醉(GA)及使用阿片类药物进行术后镇痛在缓解疼痛、副作用、麻醉后恢复情况以及改良根治性乳房切除术后出院情况等方面进行了比较。60例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为II级和III级的接受乳房切除术的患者被随机分为两个研究组,每组30例。在TEA组,于T6 - 7间隙置入硬膜外导管,注入5 - 10 mL 0.2%的罗哌卡因以维持麻醉并持续给予充分镇痛48小时。GA组静脉注射1 - 2 mg咪达唑仑或50 - 100μg/mL芬太尼,随后给予50 - 150 mg丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并用七氟醚和50%氧化亚氮与氧气混合维持麻醉。采用Aldrete评分系统评估麻醉后恢复情况,使用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛强度,采用麻醉后出院评分系统评估出院回家情况。两组的人口统计学数据以及副作用(恶心和呕吐除外)(GA组43%,TEA组10%,P = 0.0074)和出院回家情况相似。然而,麻醉后第1小时内准备从恢复室出院(Aldrete评分为10分)的患者数量,TEA组(80%)显著多于GA组(33%)(P = 0.0006)。在术后第0天(70%)、第1天(53%)和第2天(27%),GA组患者经历的剧烈疼痛明显多于TEA组患者(P < 0.001)。患者对TEA的满意度(70%)高于GA(30%)(P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,与GA相比,罗哌卡因用于TEA能提供更好的术后疼痛缓解,减少恶心和呕吐,促进麻醉后恢复,并提高患者满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验