Dimech Wayne, Panagiotopoulos Lena, Marler Joan, Laven Nicolas, Leeson Susan, Dax Elizabeth M
National Seratology Reference Laboratory, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Australia.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1104-8. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005.
Three automated assays (Abbott AxSYM, Bayer ADVIA Centaur, and bioMerieux VIDAS) used for the detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M were evaluated. A total of 57 samples from individuals with evidence of infection with rubella virus were used to estimate sensitivity, and 220 samples from blood donors and individuals attending an antenatal clinic who had no evidence of recent infection were used to estimate specificity. Seroconversion panels comprising an additional 31 samples from four individuals were used to determine clinical sensitivity. Samples containing potentially cross-reacting substances were also tested. The sensitivities of the three assays ranged from 84.2 to 96.5%, and the specificities ranged from 96.8 to 99.9%. The Abbott AxSYM assay detected more reactive samples than the other two assays when a panel of 57 positive samples was tested. Bayer ADVIA Centaur detected more reactive samples in the seroconversion panels than the other two assays. All three assays evaluated reported a reactive result in 1 or more of the 48 samples containing potentially cross-reacting analytes. The assays demonstrated comparable performance in testing of a well-characterized panel of samples.
对用于检测风疹病毒特异性免疫球蛋白M的三种自动化检测方法(雅培AxSYM、拜耳ADVIA Centaur和生物梅里埃VIDAS)进行了评估。总共使用了57份来自有风疹病毒感染证据个体的样本估计敏感性,使用了220份来自献血者和产前检查个体且无近期感染证据的样本估计特异性。由来自4名个体的另外31份样本组成的血清转化样本组用于确定临床敏感性。还对含有潜在交叉反应物质的样本进行了检测。三种检测方法的敏感性范围为84.2%至96.5%,特异性范围为96.8%至99.9%。在检测一组57份阳性样本时,雅培AxSYM检测方法比其他两种检测方法检测到更多反应性样本。在血清转化样本组中,拜耳ADVIA Centaur比其他两种检测方法检测到更多反应性样本。在检测的48份含有潜在交叉反应分析物的样本中,所有三种评估的检测方法均在1份或更多样本中报告了反应性结果。在对一组特征明确的样本进行检测时,这些检测方法表现出相当的性能。