Haubelt Hannelore, Anders Christof, Hellstern Peter
Institute of Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Academic City Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;31(4):404-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916674.
"Aspirin resistance" and "aspirin nonresponsiveness" are terms used both to describe both the failure of aspirin to protect subgroups of individuals from severe vascular events and to evoke an appropriate inhibition of platelet function. Several studies utilizing a broad range of platelet function tests have shown that some subgroups of individuals exhibit a reduced or completely missing antiplatelet response to aspirin. The clinical significance of aspirin nonresponsiveness for the prediction of clinical endpoints remains, however, to be determined. Thus far, only three prospective clinical trials have demonstrated a possible relationship between aspirin nonresponsiveness and subsequent vascular events. Most platelet function tests used in respective clinical studies cannot be reliably performed in clinical routine and are not interchangeable for monitoring antiplatelet treatment. There is a need for a simple and reliable assay for predicting the clinical efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. Recent data demonstrate that none of the currently developed assays, including the PFA-100 system, are presently able to accomplish these objectives.
“阿司匹林抵抗”和“阿司匹林无反应性”这两个术语既用于描述阿司匹林未能保护部分个体免于发生严重血管事件,也用于描述阿司匹林未能有效抑制血小板功能。多项使用广泛血小板功能检测方法的研究表明,部分个体亚组对阿司匹林的抗血小板反应减弱或完全缺失。然而,阿司匹林无反应性对临床终点预测的临床意义仍有待确定。迄今为止,仅有三项前瞻性临床试验证明了阿司匹林无反应性与后续血管事件之间可能存在关联。各自临床研究中使用的大多数血小板功能检测方法无法在临床常规操作中可靠地进行,并且在监测抗血小板治疗时不可相互替代。需要一种简单可靠的检测方法来预测抗血小板治疗的临床疗效。最新数据表明,目前开发的检测方法,包括PFA - 100系统,均无法实现这些目标。