van Hout Hein P J, Nijpels Giel, van Marwijk Harm W J, Jansen Aaltje P D, Van't Veer Petronella J, Tybout Willemijn, Stalman Wim A B
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Department of General Practice, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr. 2005 Sep 8;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-5-11.
The objective of this article is to describe the design of an evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of systematic home visits by nurses to frail elderly primary care patients. Pilot objectives were: 1. To determine the feasibility of postal multidimensional frailty screening instruments; 2. to identify the need for home visits to elderly.
Main study: The main study concerns a randomized controlled in primary care practices (PCP) with 18 months follow-up and blinded PCPs. Frail persons aged 75 years or older and living at home but neither terminally ill nor demented from 33 PCPs were eligible. Trained community nurses (1) visit patients at home and assess the care needs with the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care, a multidimensional computerized geriatric assessment instrument, enabling direct identification of problem areas; (2) determine the care priorities together with the patient; (3) design and execute interventions according to protocols; (4) and visit patients at least five times during a year in order to execute and monitor the care-plan. Controls receive usual care. Outcome measures are Quality of life, and Quality Adjusted Life Years; time to nursing home admission; mortality; hospital admissions; health care utilization. Pilot 1: Three brief postal multidimensional screening measures to identify frail health among elderly persons were tested on percentage complete item response (selected after a literature search): 1) Vulnerable Elders Screen, 2) Strawbridge's frailty screen, and 3) COOP-WONCA charts. Pilot 2: Three nurses visited elderly frail patients as identified by PCPs in a health center of 5400 patients and used an assessment protocol to identify psychosocial and medical problems. The needs and experiences of all participants were gathered by semi-structured interviews.
The design holds several unique elements such as early identification of frail persons combined with case-management by nurses. From two pilots we learned that of three potential postal frailty measures, the COOP-WONCA charts were completed best by elderly and that preventive home visits by nurses were positively evaluated to have potential for quality of care improvement.
本文旨在描述一项针对护士对体弱老年初级护理患者进行系统性家访的成本效益评估设计。试点目标为:1. 确定邮寄多维衰弱筛查工具的可行性;2. 确定对老年人进行家访的需求。
主要研究:主要研究涉及在初级护理实践(PCP)中进行的随机对照试验,随访18个月且初级护理人员不知情。来自33个初级护理实践机构的75岁及以上、居家生活、非绝症且非痴呆的体弱患者符合条件。经过培训的社区护士:(1)上门访视患者,并使用居民评估工具 - 家庭护理(一种多维计算机化老年评估工具)评估护理需求,从而直接确定问题领域;(2)与患者共同确定护理重点;(3)根据方案设计并实施干预措施;(4)每年至少访视患者五次,以执行和监测护理计划。对照组接受常规护理。结果指标包括生活质量、质量调整生命年;入住养老院的时间;死亡率;住院次数;医疗保健利用率。试点1:对三种简短的邮寄多维筛查措施进行测试,以确定老年人中的体弱健康状况,根据文献检索选择的指标为完整项目应答百分比:1)脆弱老年人筛查,2)斯特劳布里奇衰弱筛查,3)COOP - WONCA图表。试点2:三名护士访视了一家拥有5400名患者的健康中心的初级护理人员确定的体弱老年患者,并使用评估方案确定心理社会和医疗问题。通过半结构化访谈收集所有参与者的需求和经历。
该设计具有几个独特的要素,如早期识别体弱患者并结合护士的病例管理。从两个试点中我们了解到,在三种潜在的邮寄衰弱测量方法中,老年人对COOP - WONCA图表的完成情况最佳,并且护士的预防性家访得到了积极评价,认为有改善护理质量的潜力。