Rothschild Marc
Rohm and Haas Company Engineering Division, Croydon, PA 19021, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Mar 17;130(1-2):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.036. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
Commonly used equations have been developed which allow application of failure rate data for safeguards. While these equations often give reasonable results, they can significantly over predict the risk for some conditions. This can lead the analyst to believe that a given operation presents an unacceptable risk, requiring additional safety measures when, in fact, the operation may actually meet the risk criteria. This paper shows the limitations of the commonly used equations by comparing those equations with hazard rates generated from Monte Carlo simulations. A little-known equation is then presented, which is shown to precisely match the Monte Carlo simulations. It is suggested that this equation be used when accuracy is required.
已经开发出了常用方程,这些方程允许将故障率数据应用于安全保障措施。虽然这些方程通常能给出合理的结果,但它们可能会显著高估某些情况下的风险。这可能会使分析人员认为某一特定操作存在不可接受的风险,从而需要采取额外的安全措施,而实际上该操作可能实际上符合风险标准。本文通过将这些常用方程与蒙特卡洛模拟生成的危险率进行比较,展示了这些常用方程的局限性。然后给出了一个鲜为人知的方程,该方程被证明与蒙特卡洛模拟精确匹配。建议在需要准确性时使用此方程。