• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精问题治疗的成本效益:英国酒精治疗随机试验(UKATT)的结果

Cost effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT).

出版信息

BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):544. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.544.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.544
PMID:16150765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1200587/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost effectiveness of social behaviour and network therapy, a new treatment for alcohol problems, with that of the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

DESIGN

Cost effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic randomised trial.

SETTING

Seven treatment sites around Birmingham, Cardiff, and Leeds.

PARTICIPANTS

742 clients with alcohol problems; 617 (83.2%) were interviewed at 12 months and full economic data were obtained on 608 (98.5% of 617). Main economic measures Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), costs of trial treatments, and consequences for public sector resources (health care, other alcohol treatment, social services, and criminal justice services).

RESULTS

Both therapies saved about five times as much in expenditure on health, social, and criminal justice services as they cost. Neither net savings nor cost effectiveness differed significantly between the therapies, despite the average cost of social behaviour and network therapy (221 pounds sterling; 385 dollars; 320 euros) being significantly more than that of motivational enhancement therapy (129 pounds sterling). If a QALY were worth 30,000 pounds sterling, then the motivational therapy would have 58% chance of being more cost effective than the social therapy, and the social therapy would have 42% chance of being more cost effective than the motivational therapy.

CONCLUSION

Participants reported highly significant reductions in drinking and associated problems and costs. The novel social behaviour and network therapy did not differ significantly in cost effectiveness from the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

摘要

目的

比较社会行为与网络疗法(一种治疗酒精问题的新疗法)和已证实有效的动机增强疗法的成本效益。

设计

成本效益分析与一项实用随机试验同步进行。

地点

伯明翰、加的夫和利兹周边的七个治疗地点。

参与者

742名有酒精问题的客户;617名(83.2%)在12个月时接受了访谈,并获取了608名(617名的98.5%)的完整经济数据。主要经济指标 质量调整生命年(QALYs)、试验治疗成本以及对公共部门资源(医疗保健、其他酒精治疗、社会服务和刑事司法服务)的影响。

结果

两种疗法在医疗、社会和刑事司法服务方面节省的支出均约为其成本的五倍。尽管社会行为与网络疗法的平均成本(221英镑;385美元;320欧元)显著高于动机增强疗法(129英镑),但两种疗法在净节省或成本效益方面均无显著差异。如果一个质量调整生命年价值30000英镑,那么动机疗法比社会疗法更具成本效益的概率为58%,而社会疗法比动机疗法更具成本效益的概率为42%。

结论

参与者报告饮酒及相关问题和成本显著降低。新型社会行为与网络疗法在成本效益方面与已证实有效的动机增强疗法无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT).酒精问题治疗的成本效益:英国酒精治疗随机试验(UKATT)的结果
BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):544. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.544.
2
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.英国背痛锻炼与手法治疗(UK BEAM)随机试验:基层医疗中背痛物理治疗的成本效益
BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1381. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38282.607859.AE. Epub 2004 Nov 19.
3
Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT).酒精问题治疗的有效性:英国酒精治疗随机试验(UKATT)的结果
BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.541.
4
A cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial of post-acute care of older people in a community hospital.社区医院中老年人急性后期护理随机对照试验的成本效益分析。
BMJ. 2006 Jul 29;333(7561):228. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38887.558576.7C. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
5
Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial.脊柱手术稳定术与强化康复方案治疗慢性下腰痛患者的比较:基于随机对照试验的成本效用分析
BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38441.429618.8F. Epub 2005 May 23.
6
Shoulder acute pain in primary health care: is retraining GPs effective? The SAPPHIRE randomized trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.基层医疗保健中的肩部急性疼痛:对全科医生进行再培训是否有效?蓝宝石随机试验:一项成本效益分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May;48(5):558-63. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep008. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
7
Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care.在初级医疗保健中,由具有特殊兴趣的全科医生主导的皮肤科服务的经济评估。
BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1444-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38676.446910.7C. Epub 2005 Dec 8.
8
Falls and health status in elderly women following first eye cataract surgery: an economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial.老年女性首次白内障手术后的跌倒与健康状况:一项与随机对照试验同时进行的经济学评估。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;91(12):1675-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.118687. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
9
Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care back and neck pain patients: cost effectiveness analysis.针对基层医疗中背部和颈部疼痛患者的两种物理治疗干预措施的随机试验:成本效益分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Sep;46(9):1495-501. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem183.
10
UK Alcohol Treatment Trial: client-treatment matching effects.英国酒精治疗试验:客户与治疗的匹配效果。
Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):228-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02060.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis of two psychological treatments for controlled drinking in individuals alcohol use disorder.针对酒精使用障碍个体控制饮酒的两种心理治疗方法的成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Jun 2;23(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00633-9.
2
Effectiveness of a smartphone app (Drink Less) versus usual digital care for reducing alcohol consumption among increasing-and-higher-risk adult drinkers in the UK: a two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.一款智能手机应用程序(少饮酒)与常规数字护理对减少英国饮酒风险增加及更高风险成年饮酒者酒精摄入量的效果比较:一项双臂、平行组、双盲随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 24;70:102534. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102534. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
4
An application of moderated nonlinear factor analysis to develop a commensurate measure of alcohol problems across four alcohol treatment studies.应用均衡非线性因子分析为四项酒精治疗研究开发一种相称的酒精问题衡量标准。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt A):109068. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109068. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
A two-arm parallel-group individually randomised prison pilot study of a male remand alcohol intervention for self-efficacy enhancement: the APPRAISE study protocol.一项针对男性还押犯的酒精干预措施以增强自我效能的双臂平行分组个体随机监狱试点研究:APPRAISE 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 2;11(4):e040636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040636.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of the smartphone app, Drink Less, compared with the NHS alcohol advice webpage, for the reduction of alcohol consumption among hazardous and harmful adult drinkers in the UK at 6-month follow-up: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估智能手机应用程序“少喝酒”与英国国民保健制度酒精建议网页相比,在 6 个月随访时减少英国危险和有害成年饮酒者饮酒量的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案。
Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):412-425. doi: 10.1111/add.15287. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Alcohol care teams: where are we now?酒精护理团队:我们现在处于什么状况?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;11(4):293-302. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101241. eCollection 2020.
8
Assertive outreach treatment versus care as usual for the treatment of high-need, high-cost alcohol related frequent attenders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.积极外展治疗与常规护理对高需求、高成本酒精相关频繁就诊者的治疗效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8437-y.
9
Integrated treatment program for alcohol related problems in community hospitals, Songkhla province of Thailand: A social return on investment analysis.泰国宋卡府社区医院酒精相关问题综合治疗方案:社会投资回报分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0209210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209210. eCollection 2019.
10
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.简短酒精干预措施在初级保健人群中的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2(2):CD004148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT).酒精问题治疗的有效性:英国酒精治疗随机试验(UKATT)的结果
BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.541.
2
Calculation of quality adjusted life years in the published literature: a review of methodology and transparency.已发表文献中质量调整生命年的计算:方法与透明度综述
Health Econ. 2004 Dec;13(12):1203-10. doi: 10.1002/hec.901.
3
The relative contribution of outcome domains in the total economic benefit of addiction interventions: a review of first findings.成瘾干预措施的总体经济效益中各结果领域的相对贡献:初步研究结果综述。
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98(12):1647-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00541.x.
4
NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE):更快获得现代治疗方法?对卫生技术指南的分析
BMJ. 2001 Dec 1;323(7324):1300-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7324.1300.
5
Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.统计学笔记:分析具有基线和随访测量的对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.
6
The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study.在对照试验中使用相对于基线的百分比变化作为结果在统计学上是低效的:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-1-6. Epub 2001 Jun 28.
7
Association of outpatient alcohol and drug treatment with health care utilization and cost: revisiting the offset hypothesis.门诊酒精和药物治疗与医疗保健利用及成本的关联:重新审视抵消假说。
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Jan;62(1):89-97. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.89.
8
United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT): hypotheses, design and methods.英国酒精治疗试验(UKATT):假设、设计与方法
Alcohol Alcohol. 2001 Jan-Feb;36(1):11-21. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/36.1.11.
9
Alcoholism treatment and medical care costs from Project MATCH.来自“匹配计划”的酒精成瘾治疗及医疗护理费用。
Addiction. 2000 Jul;95(7):999-1013. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9579993.x.
10
Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions.在对医疗保健干预措施进行经济评估时应对不确定性。
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(2):1-134.