• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利奈唑胺:对其用于严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的药物经济学综述

Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.

作者信息

Plosker Greg L, Figgitt David P

机构信息

Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(9):945-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006
PMID:16153136
Abstract

Linezolid (Zyvox), the first available oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, has good activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Randomised multicentre trials in patients with various types of serious Gram-positive infections showed that clinical cure rates with linezolid were similar to those with vancomycin or teicoplanin. In some subgroup analyses, which must be interpreted with a degree of caution, clinical advantages were noted for linezolid (e.g. versus vancomycin in confirmed MRSA nosocomial pneumonia and MRSA-complicated skin and soft tissue infections). Although generally well tolerated, gastrointestinal adverse effects are relatively common with linezolid and it has been associated with thrombocytopenia and myelosuppression. The oral bioavailability of linezolid is approximately 100%, thus allowing sequential intravenous-to-oral administration without changing the drug or dosage regimen. Healthcare resource use data from various countries indicate that this practical advantage translates into at least a trend towards reduced length of hospital stay compared with vancomycin, which may offset its several-fold higher acquisition cost. Modelled analyses from the US, despite some limitations, indicate that, compared with vancomycin, linezolid is associated with lower total hospitalisation costs for the treatment of patients with cellulitis and has a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately US30,000 dollars per QALY gained (2001 value) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Broadly similar results have also been reported in modelled analyses from other countries. In conclusion, for patients with serious Gram-positive infections, including those caused by suspected or proven multidrug-resistant pathogens such as MRSA, linezolid is an effective and generally well tolerated therapeutic option. Linezolid is currently the only antibacterial agent with good activity against MRSA that can be administered orally (as well as intravenously). It may be particularly useful as an alternative to vancomycin in patients who have impaired renal function, poor or no intravenous access, require outpatient therapy, or who have been unable to tolerate glycopeptides. Healthcare resource use studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses generally support the use of linezolid in some subgroups of patients, although results should be interpreted with due consideration of the study limitations.

摘要

利奈唑胺(Zyvox)是首个上市的恶唑烷酮类抗菌药物,对革兰氏阳性病原体具有良好活性,包括耐多药菌株,如耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素屎肠球菌。针对各类严重革兰氏阳性感染患者开展的随机多中心试验表明,利奈唑胺的临床治愈率与万古霉素或替考拉宁相似。在某些需谨慎解读的亚组分析中,利奈唑胺显示出临床优势(如在确诊的MRSA医院获得性肺炎和MRSA合并皮肤及软组织感染中与万古霉素相比)。尽管利奈唑胺一般耐受性良好,但胃肠道不良反应相对常见,且与血小板减少和骨髓抑制有关。利奈唑胺的口服生物利用度约为100%,因此可进行序贯静脉至口服给药,而无需改变药物或剂量方案。来自各国的医疗资源使用数据表明,这一实际优势转化为与万古霉素相比至少有缩短住院时间的趋势,这可能抵消其数倍更高的购置成本。美国的模型分析尽管存在一些局限性,但表明与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺治疗蜂窝织炎患者的总住院费用更低,对于呼吸机相关性肺炎患者,每获得一个质量调整生命年(2001年价值)的增量成本效益比约为30,000美元,具有良好效益。其他国家的模型分析也报告了大致相似的结果。总之,对于严重革兰氏阳性感染患者,包括由疑似或已证实的耐多药病原体(如MRSA)引起的感染,利奈唑胺是一种有效且耐受性一般良好的治疗选择。利奈唑胺是目前唯一对MRSA具有良好活性且可口服(以及静脉注射)的抗菌药物。对于肾功能受损、静脉通路不佳或无静脉通路、需要门诊治疗或无法耐受糖肽类药物的患者,它作为万古霉素的替代药物可能特别有用。医疗资源使用研究和药物经济学分析总体上支持在某些患者亚组中使用利奈唑胺,尽管应充分考虑研究局限性来解读结果。

相似文献

1
Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.利奈唑胺:对其用于严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(9):945-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006.
2
Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.在一项评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂性皮肤和软组织感染患者的临床试验中,利奈唑胺对经济结果及成本决定因素的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G728. Epub 2006 May 23.
3
Hospital resource use and cost of treatment with linezolid versus teicoplanin for treatment of serious gram-positive bacterial infections among hospitalized patients from South America and Mexico: results from a multicenter trial.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗南美洲和墨西哥住院患者严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的医院资源利用及治疗成本:一项多中心试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2003 Jun;25(6):1846-71. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80173-x.
4
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.法国住院复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者使用利奈唑胺与万古霉素的成本效益分析
Med Mal Infect. 2009 May;39(5):330-40. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
5
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid vs vancomycin in suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗德国疑似耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院获得性肺炎的成本效益
Infection. 2009 Apr;37(2):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8046-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
6
Benefit-risk assessment of linezolid for serious gram-positive bacterial infections.利奈唑胺用于严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的获益-风险评估
Drug Saf. 2008;31(9):753-68. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831090-00004.
7
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of linezolid versus teicoplanin in bacteremia by Gram-positive microorganisms.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗革兰氏阳性微生物所致菌血症的药物经济学评价
Pharm World Sci. 2005 Dec;27(6):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11096-005-1638-8.
8
Modeling the economic impact of linezolid versus vancomycin in confirmed nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致确诊医院获得性肺炎的经济影响建模
Crit Care. 2014 Jul 22;18(4):R157. doi: 10.1186/cc13996.
9
Economic evaluation of linezolid, flucloxacillin and vancomycin in the empirical treatment of cellulitis in UK hospitals: a decision analytical model.利奈唑胺、氟氯西林和万古霉素在英国医院蜂窝织炎经验性治疗中的经济学评估:一项决策分析模型
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Dec;49 Suppl A:S13-24. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(01)90030-1.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: complicated skin and skin structure infection using Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis.利奈唑胺、达托霉素和万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的成本效益分析:采用贝叶斯方法进行证据综合的复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):631-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Linezolid for the treatment of postneurosurgical infection caused by methicillin-resistant .利奈唑胺用于治疗耐甲氧西林引起的神经外科术后感染。
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Nov 8;10:215. doi: 10.25259/SNI_455_2019. eCollection 2019.
2
Management of methicillin-resistant mediated ventilator-associated pneumonia.耐甲氧西林介导的呼吸机相关性肺炎的管理。
Curr Trends Microbiol. 2018;12:95-107.
3
Estimating the potential annual welfare impact of innovative drugs in use in Switzerland.估算瑞士已使用创新药物的潜在年度福利影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin in Spain.西班牙利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的成本效益分析。
J Chemother. 2005 Apr;17(2):203-11. doi: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.2.203.
2
Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤及软组织感染的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2260-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2260-2266.2005.
3
Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Front Public Health. 2014 May 20;2:48. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00048. eCollection 2014.
4
Use of linezolid in neonatal and pediatric inpatient facilities--results of a retrospective multicenter survey.利奈唑胺在新生儿和儿科住院病房中的应用——一项回顾性多中心调查的结果。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1435-42. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1461-1. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
5
Revisiting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.重新审视耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染
J Glob Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;2(1):49-56. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.59251.
6
Epidemiology and economic impact of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: review and analysis of the literature.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的流行病学及经济影响:文献综述与分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(9):751-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725090-00004.
口服利奈唑胺与静脉注射万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性下肢皮肤和软组织感染的临床及经济学结果
Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.011.
4
Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia.成人医院获得性肺炎、呼吸机相关性肺炎和医疗保健相关性肺炎管理指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST.
5
Healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults: management principles to improve outcomes.
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;18(4):939-62. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2004.08.001.
6
Reversion to susceptibility in a linezolid-resistant clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus.耐利奈唑胺金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株回复为敏感状态
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):818-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh423. Epub 2004 Sep 3.
7
Linezolid and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: the subtleties of subgroup analyses.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院获得性肺炎:亚组分析的微妙之处
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):314-5; author reply 315-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.314.
8
Unresolved questions with the use of linezolid vs vancomycin for nosocomial pneumonia.关于使用利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗医院获得性肺炎的未解决问题。
Chest. 2004 Jun;125(6):2370-1. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2370.
9
An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious Gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects.一项针对利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的多中心试验中欧洲队列的经济学评估:治疗环境在评估治疗效果中的重要性
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Apr;23(4):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.020.
10
Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.达托霉素:另一种用于治疗耐药革兰氏阳性病原体所致感染的新型药物。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 1;38(7):994-1000. doi: 10.1086/383472. Epub 2004 Mar 11.