Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺:对其用于严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的药物经济学综述

Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.

作者信息

Plosker Greg L, Figgitt David P

机构信息

Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(9):945-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006.

Abstract

Linezolid (Zyvox), the first available oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, has good activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Randomised multicentre trials in patients with various types of serious Gram-positive infections showed that clinical cure rates with linezolid were similar to those with vancomycin or teicoplanin. In some subgroup analyses, which must be interpreted with a degree of caution, clinical advantages were noted for linezolid (e.g. versus vancomycin in confirmed MRSA nosocomial pneumonia and MRSA-complicated skin and soft tissue infections). Although generally well tolerated, gastrointestinal adverse effects are relatively common with linezolid and it has been associated with thrombocytopenia and myelosuppression. The oral bioavailability of linezolid is approximately 100%, thus allowing sequential intravenous-to-oral administration without changing the drug or dosage regimen. Healthcare resource use data from various countries indicate that this practical advantage translates into at least a trend towards reduced length of hospital stay compared with vancomycin, which may offset its several-fold higher acquisition cost. Modelled analyses from the US, despite some limitations, indicate that, compared with vancomycin, linezolid is associated with lower total hospitalisation costs for the treatment of patients with cellulitis and has a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately US30,000 dollars per QALY gained (2001 value) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Broadly similar results have also been reported in modelled analyses from other countries. In conclusion, for patients with serious Gram-positive infections, including those caused by suspected or proven multidrug-resistant pathogens such as MRSA, linezolid is an effective and generally well tolerated therapeutic option. Linezolid is currently the only antibacterial agent with good activity against MRSA that can be administered orally (as well as intravenously). It may be particularly useful as an alternative to vancomycin in patients who have impaired renal function, poor or no intravenous access, require outpatient therapy, or who have been unable to tolerate glycopeptides. Healthcare resource use studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses generally support the use of linezolid in some subgroups of patients, although results should be interpreted with due consideration of the study limitations.

摘要

利奈唑胺(Zyvox)是首个上市的恶唑烷酮类抗菌药物,对革兰氏阳性病原体具有良好活性,包括耐多药菌株,如耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素屎肠球菌。针对各类严重革兰氏阳性感染患者开展的随机多中心试验表明,利奈唑胺的临床治愈率与万古霉素或替考拉宁相似。在某些需谨慎解读的亚组分析中,利奈唑胺显示出临床优势(如在确诊的MRSA医院获得性肺炎和MRSA合并皮肤及软组织感染中与万古霉素相比)。尽管利奈唑胺一般耐受性良好,但胃肠道不良反应相对常见,且与血小板减少和骨髓抑制有关。利奈唑胺的口服生物利用度约为100%,因此可进行序贯静脉至口服给药,而无需改变药物或剂量方案。来自各国的医疗资源使用数据表明,这一实际优势转化为与万古霉素相比至少有缩短住院时间的趋势,这可能抵消其数倍更高的购置成本。美国的模型分析尽管存在一些局限性,但表明与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺治疗蜂窝织炎患者的总住院费用更低,对于呼吸机相关性肺炎患者,每获得一个质量调整生命年(2001年价值)的增量成本效益比约为30,000美元,具有良好效益。其他国家的模型分析也报告了大致相似的结果。总之,对于严重革兰氏阳性感染患者,包括由疑似或已证实的耐多药病原体(如MRSA)引起的感染,利奈唑胺是一种有效且耐受性一般良好的治疗选择。利奈唑胺是目前唯一对MRSA具有良好活性且可口服(以及静脉注射)的抗菌药物。对于肾功能受损、静脉通路不佳或无静脉通路、需要门诊治疗或无法耐受糖肽类药物的患者,它作为万古霉素的替代药物可能特别有用。医疗资源使用研究和药物经济学分析总体上支持在某些患者亚组中使用利奈唑胺,尽管应充分考虑研究局限性来解读结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验