Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗德国疑似耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院获得性肺炎的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid vs vancomycin in suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.

作者信息

De Cock E, Krueger W A, Sorensen S, Baker T, Hardewig J, Duttagupta S, Müller E, Piecyk A, Reisinger E, Resch A

机构信息

Health Economics, United BioSource Corporation, Carrer Torrent del Remei, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Infection. 2009 Apr;37(2):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8046-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The oxazolidinone antibiotic linezolid has demonstrated efficacy in treating infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In a retrospective analysis of two prospective randomized clinical trials in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), initial therapy with linezolid produced significantly better clinical cure and survival rates than vancomycin in the subset of patients with documented MRSA infection. This study was designed to evaluate the economic impact of these clinical outcomes from the perspective of the German health care system to determine the use of these regimens in the light of limited resources and rising costs.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model using clinical trial data was developed to examine the costs and outcomes of treatment with linezolid or vancomycin in hospitalized patients with NP caused by suspected MRSA. The model followed an average patient from initiation of empiric treatment until treatment success, death, or second-line treatment failure. Local treatment patterns and resource use were obtained from a Delphi panel. Costs were taken from published sources. Outcomes included total cost per patient, cost per additional cure, cost per death avoided, and cost per life-year gained.

RESULTS

The model calculated that linezolid was associated with an 8.7% higher cure rate compared with vancomycin (73.6% vs 64.9%, respectively). Average total costs per episode for linezolid- and vancomycin-treated patients were 12,829 and 12,409, respectively. Death rates were 13.2% lower with linezolid than with vancomycin (20.7% vs 33.9%), resulting in an average of 2.3 life-years gained per linezolid-treated patient in a 65-year-old cohort (14.0 life-years vs 11.7 life-years). With linezolid, incremental costs per death avoided and per patient cured were 3,171 and 4,813, respectively. The base case estimated a similar mean length of stay for both drugs (11.2 vs 10.8 days). One-way sensitivity analyses did not change the overall results.

CONCLUSION

The model estimated a higher clinical cure (+8.7%) and survival (+13.2%) for linezolid compared with vancomycin at an incremental cost of 420 per treatment episode. The cost-benefit profile suggests that linezolid could be considered a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of patients with NP caused by suspected MRSA in Germany.

摘要

背景

恶唑烷酮类抗生素利奈唑胺已被证明在治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的感染方面有效。在一项对两项医院获得性肺炎(NP)患者前瞻性随机临床试验的回顾性分析中,在有记录的MRSA感染患者亚组中,利奈唑胺初始治疗产生的临床治愈率和生存率显著高于万古霉素。本研究旨在从德国医疗保健系统的角度评估这些临床结果的经济影响,以根据资源有限和成本上升的情况确定这些治疗方案的使用。

方法

开发了一个使用临床试验数据的决策分析模型,以检查利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗疑似MRSA引起的NP住院患者的成本和结果。该模型跟踪一名平均患者从经验性治疗开始直至治疗成功、死亡或二线治疗失败。当地治疗模式和资源使用情况来自一个德尔菲小组。成本取自已发表的资料。结果包括每位患者的总成本、每多治愈一例的成本、每避免一例死亡的成本以及每获得一个生命年的成本。

结果

该模型计算得出,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺的治愈率高8.7%(分别为73.6%和64.9%)。利奈唑胺治疗患者和万古霉素治疗患者每疗程的平均总成本分别为12,829欧元和12,409欧元。利奈唑胺的死亡率比万古霉素低13.2%(20.7%对33.9%),在一个65岁的队列中,每位接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者平均多获得2.3个生命年(14.0个生命年对11.7个生命年)。使用利奈唑胺时,每避免一例死亡和每治愈一例患者的增量成本分别为3,171欧元和4,813欧元。基础病例估计两种药物的平均住院时间相似(分别为11.2天和10.8天)。单向敏感性分析未改变总体结果。

结论

该模型估计,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺的临床治愈率(提高8.7%)和生存率(提高13.2%)更高,每疗程增量成本为420欧元。成本效益分析表明,在德国治疗疑似MRSA引起的NP患者时,利奈唑胺可被视为万古霉素具有成本效益的替代药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验