Kim Dong Wook, Rho Myung Ho, Kim Hak Jin, Kwon Jae Su, Sung Young Sun, Lee Sang Wook
Department of Radiology, Masan Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Masan, South Korea.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Sep;26(8):2122-7.
We evaluated the differences between percutaneous ethanol injection with and without aspiration of ethanol-mixed fluid for treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules.
We examined 60 patients with benign cystic thyroid nodules confirmed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and divided them into 2 groups according to nonaspiration (group A, n = 30) or aspiration (group B, n = 30) of ethanol-mixed fluid after intracystic ethanol injection. We evaluated in both groups the complete disappearance of the cystic portion of the thyroid nodule on follow-up ultrasonography (first follow-up ultrasonography; mean, 4.6 months in group A; mean, 4.4 months in group B) (chi-square test), side effects or complications during and after the procedure (chi-square test), and the total procedure time (Student t test).
Most patients showed complete disappearance of the cystic portion of the thyroid nodule (group A, n = 29; group B, n = 28), and they revealed no recurrence on follow-up ultrasonography. There was no statistical difference in the success rates between group A and group B (P > .05). Pain, the most common side effect, and other mild side effects or complications occurred in small numbers of patients in each group, but there was no significant difference in side effects or complications between the 2 groups (P > .05), except for intracystic hemorrhage (P < .05) and the complaint of all group B patients due to a double puncture (P < .001). The total procedure time was nearly double in group B than in group A because of the additional procedures, such as complete evacuation of the ethanol-mixed fluid and the 10-minute compression.
Percutaneous ethanol injection without aspiration of ethanol-mixed fluid seems to be the preferable method of treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules from the perspective of both the physician and the patient.
我们评估了在治疗良性甲状腺囊性结节时,经皮乙醇注射过程中抽吸乙醇混合液与不抽吸乙醇混合液之间的差异。
我们检查了60例经细针穿刺活检确诊为良性甲状腺囊性结节的患者,并根据囊内注射乙醇后是否抽吸乙醇混合液将他们分为两组(A组,不抽吸,n = 30;B组,抽吸,n = 30)。我们评估了两组患者随访超声检查时甲状腺结节囊性部分的完全消失情况(首次随访超声检查;A组平均4.6个月;B组平均4.4个月)(卡方检验)、操作过程中和操作后的副作用或并发症(卡方检验)以及总操作时间(学生t检验)。
大多数患者甲状腺结节的囊性部分完全消失(A组,n = 29;B组,n = 28),且随访超声检查未发现复发。A组和B组的成功率无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。疼痛是最常见的副作用,每组均有少数患者出现其他轻微副作用或并发症,但两组间副作用或并发症无显著差异(P > 0.05),除了囊内出血(P < 0.05)以及B组所有患者因双重穿刺而提出的主诉(P < 0.001)。由于额外的操作,如完全抽空乙醇混合液和10分钟的压迫,B组的总操作时间几乎是A组的两倍。
从医生和患者的角度来看,经皮乙醇注射时不抽吸乙醇混合液似乎是治疗良性甲状腺囊性结节的更优方法。