Suppr超能文献

在眼压升高治疗研究中,青光眼视野终点后正常视野测试结果。

Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

作者信息

Keltner John L, Johnson Chris A, Levine Richard A, Fan Juanjuan, Cello Kimberly E, Kass Michael A, Gordon Mae O

机构信息

Visual Field Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California-Davis, 4860 "Y" Street, Ste. 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;123(9):1201-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.9.1201.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of normal visual field (VF) test results following 2 vs 3 consecutive, abnormal, reliable test results in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

METHODS

The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study is a prospective, multicenter follow-up study as part of a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. Sixty-four (68 eyes) of 1636 participants developed a VF primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) end point. We compared the proportion of normal VF test results after a VF POAG end point among eyes whose VF abnormality was confirmed by 2 (n = 9 eyes) vs 3 (n = 59 eyes) consecutive, abnormal, reliable VF test results.

RESULTS

The proportion of VF test results that were normal subsequent to a VF POAG end point in eyes whose abnormality was confirmed by 2 consecutive, abnormal, reliable test results was significantly higher (73 [66%] of 110) compared with eyes whose abnormality was confirmed by 3 consecutive, abnormal, reliable test results (46 [12%] of 381) (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

A VF POAG end point confirmed by 3 consecutive, abnormal, reliable VF test results appears to have greater specificity and stability than either 1 or 2 consecutive, abnormal, reliable VF test results. However, some eyes whose VF POAG end point was confirmed by 3 consecutive, abnormal, reliable test results nonetheless had 1 or more normal test results on follow-up.

摘要

目的

在眼压升高治疗研究中,比较连续2次与连续3次异常且可靠的视野(VF)检查结果之后正常视野检查结果的发生率。

方法

眼压升高治疗研究是一项前瞻性、多中心随访研究,作为纵向随机临床试验的一部分。1636名参与者中有64名(68只眼)出现了视野原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)终点。我们比较了在视野POAG终点之后,视野异常经连续2次(n = 9只眼)与连续3次(n = 59只眼)异常且可靠的视野检查结果确认的眼中,正常视野检查结果的比例。

结果

视野异常经连续2次异常且可靠的检查结果确认的眼中,在视野POAG终点之后视野检查结果为正常的比例(110只眼中有73只[66%])显著高于视野异常经连续3次异常且可靠的检查结果确认的眼中(381只眼中有46只[12%])(P = .01)。

结论

经连续3次异常且可靠的视野检查结果确认的视野POAG终点,似乎比连续1次或2次异常且可靠的视野检查结果具有更高的特异性和稳定性。然而,一些经连续3次异常且可靠的检查结果确认了视野POAG终点的眼,在随访中仍有1次或更多次正常检查结果。

相似文献

3
Asymmetries and visual field summaries as predictors of glaucoma in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Sep;47(9):3896-903. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0469.
4
Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;93(8):e615-20. doi: 10.1111/aos.12788. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.
J Glaucoma. 2013 Mar;22(3):230-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237bfe7.
7
Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test.
J Glaucoma. 2006 Apr;15(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00001.
8
Quality of Life and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;142(10):935-942. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3282.
9
Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;149(1):102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
10
Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Ophthalmology. 2010 Aug;117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.034. Epub 2010 May 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Progression or Aging? A Deep Learning Approach for Distinguishing Glaucoma Progression From Age-Related Changes in OCT Scans.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;266:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.030. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Detecting disease progression in mild, moderate and severe glaucoma.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 1;34(2):168-175. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000925. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Ocular Dominance in Open-angle Glaucoma: The Shifting Trend Depending on Stage of the Disease.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;36(3):236-243. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2021.0165. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Detection of Functional Deterioration in Glaucoma by Trend Analysis Using Overlapping Clusters of Locations.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 6;9(9):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.12. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Effects of axial length on retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer measured by spectral-domain OCT.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Aug;83(4):269-276. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200039. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Trends in the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Changes with Different Degrees of Visual Field Defects.
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 12;2020:4874876. doi: 10.1155/2020/4874876. eCollection 2020.
10
Effectiveness of a Qualitative Approach Toward Evaluating OCT Imaging for Detecting Glaucomatous Damage.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 18;7(4):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.4.7. eCollection 2018 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3873-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1171.
2
Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):643-50. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.643.
3
Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):2093-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01241-1.
5
Infrequent confirmation of visual field progression.
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1059-65. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01043-6.
6
Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar-Apr;47(2):158-73. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(01)00299-5.
7
Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;132(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00912-6.
8
Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;131(6):699-708. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00964-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验