Goebl Werner, Bresin Roberto, Galembo Alexander
Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI), Freyung 6/6, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):1154-65. doi: 10.1121/1.1944648.
This study investigated the temporal behavior of grand piano actions from different manufacturers under different touch conditions and dynamic levels. An experimental setup consisting of accelerometers and a calibrated microphone was used to capture key and hammer movements, as well as the sound signal. Five selected keys were played by pianists with two types of touch ("pressed touch" versus "struck touch") over the entire dynamic range. Discrete measurements were extracted from the accelerometer data for each of the over 2300 recorded tones (e.g., finger-key, hammer-string, and key bottom contact times, maximum hammer velocity). Travel times of the hammer (from finger-key to hammer-string) as a function of maximum hammer velocity varied clearly between the two types of touch, but only slightly between pianos. A travel time approximation used in earlier work [Goebl W., (2001). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 563-572] derived from a computer-controlled piano was verified. Constant temporal behavior over type of touch and low compression properties of the parts of the action (reflected in key bottom contact times) were hypothesized to be indicators for instrumental quality.
本研究调查了不同制造商生产的三角钢琴击弦机在不同触键条件和动态水平下的时间行为。使用由加速度计和校准麦克风组成的实验装置来捕捉琴键和琴槌的运动以及声音信号。钢琴家在整个动态范围内用两种触键方式(“按压触键”与“敲击触键”)弹奏五个选定的琴键。从超过2300个录制音符的加速度计数据中提取离散测量值(例如,手指 - 琴键、琴槌 - 琴弦和琴键底部接触时间、琴槌最大速度)。琴槌的行程时间(从手指 - 琴键到琴槌 - 琴弦)作为琴槌最大速度的函数,在两种触键方式之间变化明显,但在不同钢琴之间变化较小。验证了早期工作[戈布尔W.,(2001年)。《美国声学学会杂志》110,563 - 572]中从计算机控制钢琴得出的行程时间近似值。假设触键类型的恒定时间行为和击弦机部件的低压缩特性(反映在琴键底部接触时间上)是乐器品质的指标。