Suppr超能文献

上腔静脉阻塞时的颈部纵隔镜检查及前纵隔切开术

Cervical mediastinoscopy and anterior mediastinotomy in superior vena cava obstruction.

作者信息

Dosios Theodosios, Theakos Nikolaos, Chatziantoniou Christos

机构信息

Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery Athens University School of Medicine, 2 Chatzigianni Mexi Str, 11528, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1551-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1551.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

There is general agreement regarding the diagnostic efficacy of cervical mediastinoscopy (CMDS) and anterior mediastinotomy (AMDT) on patients with superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO), but controversy exists concerning the safety of these two diagnostic methods on that particular subset of patients. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic efficacy of CMDS and AMDT in patients with SVCO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the last 28 years, 39 consecutive patients with SVCO underwent biopsy of mediastinal lesions by CMDS (n = 18) or AMDT (n = 19) or both these techniques (n = 2). The medical records of all patients were reviewed, and demographic data, operative notes, perioperative complications, outcome, and histologic diagnoses were examined. The findings were compared with those of 367 patients without SVCO who underwent biopsy of mediastinal lesions during the same period of time. An up-to-date English-language literature search was performed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of CMDS and/or AMDT in detecting malignancies in 39 patients with SVCO was 97.4%, specificity was 100%, and diagnostic accuracy was 97.4%. There was no in-hospital mortality, while morbidity consisted of five major complications and one minor complication, including two major hemorrhages and two airway obstructions. These patients, compared to those without SVCO, showed significantly higher postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of malignancy (p < 0.001). Among 280 patients of the literature review, major hemorrhage was recorded in eight cases and airway obstruction in none.

CONCLUSIONS

CMDS and AMDT are effective methods to establish a histologic diagnosis in patients with SVCO. Although their mortality is negligible, they are accompanied by a significantly higher morbidity compared to patients without SVCO. Airway obstruction is a life-threatening complication that can occur in these patients. In our series, patients with SVCO had a higher rate of malignancy compared to patients without SVCO.

摘要

研究目的

对于颈部纵隔镜检查(CMDS)和前纵隔切开术(AMDT)对上腔静脉阻塞(SVCO)患者的诊断效能,人们已达成普遍共识,但关于这两种诊断方法对该特定患者亚组的安全性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估CMDS和AMDT对SVCO患者的安全性和诊断效能。

材料与方法

在过去28年中,39例连续的SVCO患者通过CMDS(n = 18)或AMDT(n = 19)或这两种技术(n = 2)对纵隔病变进行了活检。回顾了所有患者的病历,并检查了人口统计学数据、手术记录、围手术期并发症、结局和组织学诊断。将结果与同期367例未患SVCO而行纵隔病变活检的患者进行比较。进行了最新的英文文献检索。

结果

CMDS和/或AMDT在39例SVCO患者中检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性为97.4%,特异性为100%,诊断准确性为97.4%。无院内死亡,而发病率包括5例主要并发症和1例轻微并发症,其中包括2例大出血和2例气道阻塞。与未患SVCO的患者相比,这些患者术后发病率显著更高(p < 0.001),恶性肿瘤发生率更高(p < 0.001)。在文献综述的280例患者中,记录到8例大出血,无气道阻塞病例。

结论

CMDS和AMDT是在SVCO患者中建立组织学诊断的有效方法。虽然它们的死亡率可忽略不计,但与未患SVCO的患者相比,它们的发病率显著更高。气道阻塞是这些患者可能发生的危及生命的并发症。在我们的系列研究中,与未患SVCO的患者相比,SVCO患者的恶性肿瘤发生率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验