Suppr超能文献

通过辅助眼区中的扫视碰撞测试扫视命令的参考框架。

Frames of reference for saccadic command tested by saccade collision in the supplementary eye field.

作者信息

Park Junghyun, Schlag-Rey Madeleine, Schlag John

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):159-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.00268.2005. Epub 2005 Sep 14.

Abstract

In what frame of reference does the supplementary eye field (SEF) encode saccadic eye movements? In this study, the "saccade collision" test was used to determine whether a saccade electrically evoked in the monkey's SEF is programmed to reach an oculocentric goal or a nonoculocentric (e.g., head or body-centered) goal. If the eyes start moving just before or when an oculocentric goal is imposed by electrical stimulation, the trajectory of the saccade to that goal should compensate for the ongoing movement. Conversely, if the goal imposed by electrical stimulation is nonoculocentric, the trajectory of the evoked saccade should not be altered. In head-fixed experiments, we mapped the trajectories of evoked saccades while the monkey fixated at each of 25 positions 10 degrees apart in a 40 x 40 degrees grid. For each studied SEF site, we calculated convergences indices and found that "convergent" and "nonconvergent" sites were separately clustered: nonconvergent rostral to convergent. Then, the "saccade collision" test was systematically applied. We found compensation at sites where saccades were of the nonconvergent type and practically no compensation at sites where saccades were of the convergent type. The results indicate that the SEF can encode saccade goals in at least two frames of reference and suggest a rostrocaudal segregation in the representation of these two modes.

摘要

补充眼区(SEF)在何种参照系中对扫视眼动进行编码?在本研究中,“扫视碰撞”测试被用于确定在猴子的SEF中电诱发的扫视是否被编程为指向以眼为中心的目标或非以眼为中心的(例如,以头部或身体为中心的)目标。如果在电刺激施加以眼为中心的目标之前或之时眼睛开始移动,那么向该目标的扫视轨迹应补偿正在进行的眼动。相反,如果电刺激施加的目标是非以眼为中心的,那么诱发扫视的轨迹不应改变。在头部固定的实验中,当猴子在一个40×40度的网格中以10度间隔的25个位置中的每一个位置进行注视时,我们绘制了诱发扫视的轨迹。对于每个研究的SEF位点,我们计算了汇聚指数,发现“汇聚”和“非汇聚”位点分别聚类:非汇聚位点在汇聚位点的前方。然后,系统地应用了“扫视碰撞”测试。我们发现在非汇聚型扫视的位点存在补偿,而在汇聚型扫视的位点几乎不存在补偿。结果表明,SEF可以在至少两种参照系中对扫视目标进行编码,并提示这两种模式的表征存在前后分离。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验