Suppr超能文献

用于戒烟的药物筛查:新方法建议

Medication screening for smoking cessation: a proposal for new methodologies.

作者信息

Perkins Kenneth A, Stitzer Maxine, Lerman Caryn

机构信息

WPIC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):628-36. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0105-5. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The purpose of medication screening studies is to quickly and cheaply evaluate the clinical potential of medications, so that promising drugs proceed to large-scale clinical trials and unpromising drugs do not. Screening procedures for smoking cessation medications either are not sufficiently practical or lack clinical validity. Clinical trials have clinical validity but are often impractical as initial tests of efficacy (i.e., screening) or suffer from limited statistical power. The alternative approach of short-term, laboratory-based studies of purported mechanisms of efficacy may overcome some of the practical problems of clinical trials but appear to have limited clinical validity.

OBJECTIVES

This commentary identifies some of the limitations of current short-term screening procedures and provides suggestions for improving such studies.

RESULTS

Short-term screening studies typically use smokers unmotivated to abstain (i.e., nontreatment seekers) as participants and examine brief medication effects on clinical markers or potential mechanisms of action, including relief of withdrawal and craving during enforced abstinence or on reduction in the reinforcing effects of smoked tobacco. The limitation of these approaches is shown by their insensitivity to effects of nicotine replacement and bupropion, which are effective in clinical trials for smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical validity of short-term screening studies may improve if these studies simulate some clinical trial procedures within practical limitations. Thus, they should recruit smokers motivated to abstain, emphasize smoking abstinence as a primary index of medication response, examine effects over sufficiently long time periods to encompass the drug's mechanism of action, and assess responses in the natural environment. Whether these changes improve the sensitivity of screening studies is testable. Other research aimed specifically at identifying the mechanisms of therapeutic action of a medication may also profit from using this approach of simulating a short-term clinical trial.

摘要

理论依据

药物筛选研究的目的是快速且低成本地评估药物的临床潜力,以便有前景的药物进入大规模临床试验,而无前景的药物则不进入。戒烟药物的筛选程序要么不够实用,要么缺乏临床有效性。临床试验具有临床有效性,但作为疗效的初始测试(即筛选)往往不切实际,或者统计效力有限。另一种基于实验室的短期研究方法,即研究所谓的疗效机制,可能会克服一些临床试验的实际问题,但临床有效性似乎有限。

目的

本评论指出了当前短期筛选程序的一些局限性,并为改进此类研究提供建议。

结果

短期筛选研究通常使用没有戒烟意愿的吸烟者(即非寻求治疗者)作为参与者,并研究药物对临床指标或潜在作用机制的短期影响,包括在强制戒烟期间缓解戒断症状和渴望,或降低吸烟的强化作用。这些方法的局限性在于它们对尼古丁替代疗法和安非他酮的效果不敏感,而这两种方法在戒烟临床试验中是有效的。

结论

如果短期筛选研究在实际限制范围内模拟一些临床试验程序,其临床有效性可能会提高。因此,它们应招募有戒烟意愿的吸烟者,强调戒烟是药物反应的主要指标,在足够长的时间段内检查效果以涵盖药物的作用机制,并在自然环境中评估反应。这些改变是否能提高筛选研究的敏感性是可以检验的。其他专门旨在确定药物治疗作用机制的研究也可能从采用这种模拟短期临床试验的方法中受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验