Suppr超能文献

2022 年费尔诺奖演讲:CrEATE,一种高效的成瘾治疗疗效交叉评估方法。

The 2022 Ferno Award Address: CrEATE, an Efficient Crossover Evaluation of Addiction Treatment Efficacy.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):77-85. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac139.

Abstract

Dozens of drugs have been evaluated in recent decades for initial evidence of efficacy to aid smoking cessation (i.e. "early Phase 2" testing, according to U.S. FDA terminology), with the vast majority failing to show efficacy. Even small randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the most common early Phase 2 tests, are costly undertakings, made more unappealing by their high likelihood of failure. At the same time, another early Phase 2 approach, acute tests of drug effects on surrogate endpoints such as withdrawal or craving severity, are more practical but have little predictive clinical validity. Described here is an innovative procedure that optimally combines the validity of clinical trials with the practical advantages of surrogate endpoint studies to more efficiently determine whether or not a novel drug warrants continued clinical development. This CrEATE procedure, or Crossover Evaluation of Addiction Treatment Efficacy, does so by assessing short-term quit success in smokers highly motivated to quit when briefly treated with active drug versus placebo in a crossover design, so that quit efficacy from both conditions is compared within participants. The program to develop and evaluate CrEATE demonstrates its sensitivity to efficacy from all three FDA-approved first-line cessation medications (NRT, varenicline, bupropion), tested here as model drugs, as well as specificity in identifying lack of efficacy with a drug known to be ineffective for cessation (modafinil). CrEATE has subsequently been used to evaluate a few novel interventions, concluding they lack efficacy in increasing quit success. Future directions for the potential utility of CrEATE are provided. Implications: The ability of CrEATE to reach a Go/No Go decision more quickly and with far less cost lowers the risk of failure, meaning widespread use of the procedure should encourage the evaluation of more novel candidate drugs. With its greater efficiency, failed tests, unfortunately the most likely outcome in early Phase 2 studies, will cause less waste of resources. At the same time, CrEATE tests that indicate a novel treatment has efficacy will justify the substantial time and expense of moving forward to evaluate the drug in late Phase 2 RCTs.

摘要

几十种药物在最近几十年中已被评估,以初步证明其对戒烟的疗效(即根据美国 FDA 的术语,为“早期 2 期”测试),但绝大多数药物都未能显示出疗效。即使是小型随机临床试验(RCT),即最常见的早期 2 期测试,也是代价高昂的工作,由于其失败的可能性很高,因此更没有吸引力。与此同时,另一种早期 2 期方法是,急性测试药物对替代终点(如戒断或渴望严重程度)的影响,更具实用性,但临床预测有效性较低。这里描述的是一种创新程序,它最佳地结合了临床试验的有效性和替代终点研究的实际优势,以更有效地确定新型药物是否值得继续进行临床开发。这种 CrEATE 程序,或交叉评估成瘾治疗效果,通过评估在交叉设计中,当吸烟者在短期内接受活性药物与安慰剂治疗时,他们戒烟的短期成功率来实现,以便在参与者内部比较两种条件下的戒烟效果。开发和评估 CrEATE 的计划表明,它对所有三种美国食品和药物管理局批准的一线戒烟药物(NRT、伐尼克兰、安非他酮)的疗效都很敏感,这里将它们作为模型药物进行测试,并且在识别一种已知对戒烟无效的药物(莫达非尼)缺乏疗效方面具有特异性。CrEATE 随后被用于评估一些新的干预措施,得出的结论是它们缺乏增加戒烟成功率的效果。提供了 CrEATE 潜在效用的未来方向。 影响:CrEATE 能够更快地做出是继续还是停止的决定,并且成本要低得多,从而降低了失败的风险,这意味着广泛使用该程序应该鼓励更多新型候选药物的评估。由于效率更高,早期 2 期研究中最有可能出现的失败测试将导致资源浪费减少。与此同时,CrEATE 测试表明一种新的治疗方法有效,这将证明在后期 2 期 RCT 中进一步评估该药物的时间和费用是合理的。

相似文献

2
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7.
3
An efficient early phase 2 procedure to screen medications for efficacy in smoking cessation.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Jan;231(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3364-6. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
4
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub6.
5
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub5.
6
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub4.
7
Antidepressants for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 22;4(4):CD000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub5.
8
Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD009329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009329.pub2.
9
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub3.
10
Antidepressants for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 24;5(5):CD000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub6.

本文引用的文献

2
The New Nicotine Pouch Category: A Tobacco Harm Reduction Tool?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):623-625. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab198.
3
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
5
Beyond "Safe and Effective": The urgent need for high-impact smoking cessation medications.
Prev Med. 2021 Sep;150:106567. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106567. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Tobacco harm reduction: Past history, current controversies and a proposed approach for the future.
Prev Med. 2020 Nov;140:106099. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106099. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
Factors that influence smokers' and ex-smokers' use of IQOS: a qualitative study of IQOS users and ex-users in the UK.
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):16-23. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055306. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验