• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性会阴吊带:中期结果。

The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results.

作者信息

Comiter Craig V

机构信息

Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Arizona 85724, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):648-53. doi: 10.1002/nau.20166.

DOI:10.1002/nau.20166
PMID:16167352
Abstract

AIMS

In men with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to sphincteric incompetence, surgical options include periurethral injection of bulking agents, implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), and sling surgery. Short-term results of the male sling have generally been favorable. We report the intermediate-term results of the bone-anchored male perineal sling with a median of 4 years and minimum of 2 years follow-up.

METHODS

From March 2000 to April 2003, 48 patients (average age = 68 years) underwent male sling surgery. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively via history, physical examination, pad score, and administration of the incontinence section of the UCLA/RAND prostate cancer index (PCI).

RESULTS

Pre-operatively all patients rated their incontinence as severe, and used >or=3 pads daily. Median follow-up was 48 months (range = 24-60). Average pad usage decreased from 4.6 +/- 2.1 pads per day to 1.0 +/- 1.7 pads per day (P < 0.01). Median UCLA PCI incontinence score increased from 63-343 (P < 0.01). Overall, 31/48 patient (65%) were cured of their leakage (no problem, no pads), 7/48 (15%) were much improved (small problem, 1 pad), 3/48 (6%) were mildly improved (moderate problem, 2 pads daily), and 7/48 (15%) failed (big problem, >or=3 pads).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate-term results for the male sling demonstrate a success rate comparable to that of the AUS (80% <or= 1 pad daily). This technique has established a very low morbidity, and is a reliable alternative to AUS surgery for the treatment of male SUI.

摘要

目的

对于因括约肌功能不全导致压力性尿失禁(SUI)的男性患者,手术选择包括尿道周围注射填充剂、植入人工尿道括约肌(AUS)和吊带手术。男性吊带手术的短期效果总体良好。我们报告了骨锚定男性会阴吊带的中期结果,中位随访时间为4年,最短随访时间为2年。

方法

2000年3月至2003年4月,48例患者(平均年龄 = 68岁)接受了男性吊带手术。通过病史、体格检查、尿垫评分以及UCLA/RAND前列腺癌指数(PCI)失禁部分的评估对患者进行术前和术后评估。

结果

术前所有患者均将其尿失禁评为重度,且每天使用≥3个尿垫。中位随访时间为48个月(范围 = 24 - 60个月)。平均尿垫使用量从每天4.6±2.1个减少至每天1.0±1.7个(P < 0.01)。UCLA PCI失禁评分中位数从63提高到343(P < 0.01)。总体而言,48例患者中有31例(65%)漏尿治愈(无问题,不用尿垫),7例(15%)有显著改善(小问题,使用1个尿垫),3例(6%)有轻度改善(中度问题,每天使用2个尿垫),7例(15%)手术失败(大问题,使用≥3个尿垫)。

结论

男性吊带手术的中期结果显示成功率与AUS相当(每天使用≤1个尿垫的比例≥80%)。该技术发病率极低,是治疗男性SUI的AUS手术的可靠替代方法。

相似文献

1
The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results.男性会阴吊带:中期结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):648-53. doi: 10.1002/nau.20166.
2
The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: 24-month followup with questionnaire based assessment.男性压力性尿失禁吊带术:基于问卷调查评估的24个月随访
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):207-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000128652.99627.14.
3
Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery.一种骨锚定男性会阴吊带治疗前列腺切除术后男性压力性尿失禁长达4年的中期结果。
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):500-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08067.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
4
Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal bone-anchored male sling.新型会阴骨锚定男性吊带的患者满意度及临床疗效
Eur Urol. 2005 Feb;47(2):237-42; discussion 242. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.06.021.
5
Surgery Insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence--the artificial urinary sphincter and male sling.手术洞察:前列腺切除术后尿失禁的手术治疗——人工尿道括约肌与男性吊带
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Nov;4(11):615-24. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0935.
6
Efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter implantation after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence.前列腺切除术后尿失禁患者采用骨锚定男性吊带治疗失败后人工尿道括约肌植入术的疗效
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):942-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.022.
7
Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence.骨锚定式男性吊带治疗中重度压力性尿失禁的长期疗效。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1012-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09207.x. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
8
An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial.一种用于治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁的可调节男性吊带:一项III期多中心试验
BJU Int. 2006 Mar;97(3):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x.
9
Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence.骨锚定男性吊带与胶原蛋白植入物治疗男性尿失禁的比较。
Int J Urol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01531.x.
10
The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: urodynamic and subjective assessment.用于压力性尿失禁的男性吊带:尿动力学和主观评估
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):204-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132146.79081.da.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience.前列腺癌根治术后植入 AMS 800 人工括约肌治疗尿失禁的长期疗效:单中心经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jan-Feb;44(1):114-120. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0165.
2
The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?前列腺切除术后尿失禁的人工尿道括约肌和男性吊带:哪种患者适合哪种手术?
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jan;57(1):3-13. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.1.3. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Current interventional management of male stress urinary incontinence following urological procedures.
泌尿外科手术后男性压力性尿失禁的当前介入治疗管理
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):340-7. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.616. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
4
Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.前列腺切除术后尿失禁:病因、评估与管理。
Turk J Urol. 2014 Mar;40(1):1-8. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.222014.
5
Adjustable perineal male sling using tissue expander as an effective treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.使用组织扩张器的可调节男性会阴吊带作为前列腺切除术后尿失禁的有效治疗方法。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):312-8. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.18.
6
Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?前列腺切除术后尿失禁的手术治疗:哪种术式适合哪种患者?
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Feb;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.346. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
[Diagnosis and surgical treatment of postprostatectomy stress incontinence: recommendation of the working group Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau].前列腺切除术后压力性尿失禁的诊断与外科治疗:女性泌尿功能诊断与泌尿外科工作组建议
Urologe A. 2014 Jun;53(6):847-53. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3531-3.
8
Simultaneous penile prosthesis and male sling/artificial urinary sphincter.同时行阴茎假体和吊带/人工尿道括约肌植入术。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan;15(1):10-5. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.115. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
9
[Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: adjustable transobturator male system - results of a multicenter prospective observational study].[根治性前列腺切除术后压力性尿失禁的治疗:可调节经闭孔男性系统——一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的结果]
Urologe A. 2012 Nov;51(11):1576-83. doi: 10.1007/s00120-012-2950-2.
10
Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes.男性压力性尿失禁:手术治疗选择与结果综述
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489. doi: 10.1155/2012/287489. Epub 2012 May 8.