• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Parliamentary proposals for liberal approaches to assisted conception.

作者信息

Bahadur Gulam

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Royal Free and University College Medical School, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, UK.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60955-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60955-8
PMID:16168212
Abstract

This paper summarizes the 2005 report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, which considered the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the light of new developments in IVF and embryo research. It considers the report's recommendations as to future legislation concerning the legal status of the embryo, and regarding which forms of embryos should be used for reproductive purposes. It discusses the suggestion that the current obligation to consider the welfare of the child is unhelpful and that the case has not been made against using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for sex selection. It examines the report's recommendations concerning reform of the HFEA in the areas of its composition, inspection and licensing processes, and the suggestion that it make data on the uptake and success of IVF more readily available and encourage research into its social impact. It considers issues such as whether the HFEA has exceeded its remit and the need to compare international regulatory models and IVF practice. It explores the conflict the inquiry saw between the HFEA's role as regulator and policy maker, the recommendation that it merge its policy function with the Human Genetics Commission, and that a greater role be allotted to Parliament to consider the ethical dimension of new developments, while clinical decisions and technical standards are devolved to patients and practitioners.

摘要

相似文献

1
Parliamentary proposals for liberal approaches to assisted conception.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60955-8.
2
Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.人类生殖技术与法律:特别委员会报告
Bull Med Ethics. 2005 May(208):13-21.
3
The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.支持自由的推定:对人类受精与胚胎学管理局关于性别选择的公众咨询的评论
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):266-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60906-6.
4
Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 3: the future of reproductive technologies and the law.对生殖技术一些新发展的法律应对措施。第3部分:生殖技术与法律的未来。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2002;8(2):24-8. doi: 10.1179/hrge.8.2.g6v6030912546407.
5
Pandora's progeny: ethical issues in assisted human reproduction.
Fam Law Q. 2005 Fall;39(3):745-79.
6
Customizing conception: a survey of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the resulting social, ethical, and legal dilemmas.定制受孕:对植入前基因诊断及其引发的社会、伦理和法律困境的调查。
Duke Law Technol Rev. 2002 Jul 23:E1.
7
WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.公众舆论在伦理法律决策中应扮演什么角色?以利用植入前基因诊断进行非医学原因的性别选择为例。
Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):34-58. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
8
Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.非医学原因的性别选择的生殖技术应用。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Questioning the assumptions in the debate on assisted reproduction: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.对辅助生殖辩论中的假设提出质疑:对下议院报告《人类生殖技术与法律》的评论
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):152-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60950-9.
10
Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):268-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60907-8.