• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.

作者信息

Pennings Guido

机构信息

Ghent University, Centre for Environmental Philosophy and Bioethics, Department of Philosophy, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):268-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60907-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60907-8
PMID:15038890
Abstract

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's report on sex selection is criticized because its recommendation to prohibit all techniques for social sexing is based on unsupported allegations. As a body with a scientific status, the Authority should allow the application of some methods of sex selection for non-medical reasons in a strictly regulated fashion, in order to gather empirical evidence about the psychosocial as well as medical consequences for all people involved.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):268-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60907-8.
2
Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):270-1. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60908-x.
3
The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.支持自由的推定：对人类受精与胚胎学管理局关于性别选择的公众咨询的评论
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):266-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60906-6.
4
Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):272-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60909-1.
5
WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.公众舆论在伦理法律决策中应扮演什么角色？以利用植入前基因诊断进行非医学原因的性别选择为例。
Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):34-58. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
6
Sex selection.
Lancet. 1993 Jan 30;341(8840):298-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92639-b.
7
Procreative liberty, or collective responsibility? Comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law, and on Dahl's response.生育自由，还是集体责任？评下议院关于人类生殖技术与法律的报告以及达尔的回应。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60951-0.
8
Parliamentary proposals for liberal approaches to assisted conception.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60955-8.
9
Sex selection, child welfare and risk: a critique of the HFEA's recommendations on sex selection.性别选择、儿童福利与风险：对人类受精与胚胎学管理局性别选择建议的批判
Health Care Anal. 2004 Mar;12(1):61-8. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026654.01887.85.
10
The role of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.人类受精与胚胎学管理局的职责
Med Law Int. 1997;3(1):1-22. doi: 10.1177/096853329700300101.

引用本文的文献

1
Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections.出于非医学及中间原因的孕前性别选择：伦理思考
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(4):267-77.