Novak M, Ahlgren C, Hammarström A
Family Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Jan;30(1):191-200. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803104.
To examine the cumulative influence of adverse behavioural, social, and psychosocial circumstances from adolescence to young adulthood in explaining social differences in overweight and obesity at age 30 years and if explanations differ by gender.
A 14-year longitudinal study with 96.4% response rate.
Data from 547 men and 497 women from a town in north Sweden who were baseline examined at age 16 years and prospectively followed up to age 30 years.
Overweight and obesity were ascertained at ages 16 and 30 years. Occupation and education were used to measure socioeconomic status. The explanatory measurements were: age at menarche, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, TV viewing, home and school environment, social support, social network, and work environment.
No gender or social difference in overweight was observed at age 16 years. At age 30 years, significantly more men than women (odds ratio (OR) = 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-3.68) were overweight or obese. Educational level was associated with overweight at age 30 years, but not occupational class. Both men (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.19) and women (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.16-2.73) with low education (< or =11 years) were at risk of overweight. The factors that explained the educational gradient in overweight among men were low parental support in education during adolescence, and physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, and nonparticipation in any association during young adulthood. The educational gradient in overweight in women was explained mostly by adolescence factors, which include early age at menarche, physical inactivity, parental divorce, not being popular in school, and low school control. Restricted financial resource during young adulthood was an additional explanatory factor for women. All these factors were significantly more common among men and women with low education than with high education.
Social inequities in overweight reflect the cumulative influence of multiple adverse circumstances experienced from adolescence to young adulthood. Underlying pathways to social inequity in overweight differ between men and women. Policy implications to reduce social inequity in overweight include reduction of social differences in health behaviours and social circumstances that take place at different life stages, particularly psychosocial circumstances during adolescence.
研究从青春期到青年期不良行为、社会和心理社会环境的累积影响,以解释30岁时超重和肥胖的社会差异,以及这种解释是否因性别而异。
一项14年的纵向研究,应答率为96.4%。
来自瑞典北部一个城镇的547名男性和497名女性的数据,这些人在16岁时进行了基线检查,并前瞻性地随访至30岁。
在16岁和30岁时确定超重和肥胖情况。职业和教育用于衡量社会经济地位。解释性测量指标包括:初潮年龄、吸烟、体育活动、饮酒、看电视、家庭和学校环境、社会支持、社会网络和工作环境。
16岁时未观察到超重方面的性别或社会差异。30岁时,超重或肥胖的男性明显多于女性(优势比(OR)=2.81,95%置信区间(CI)2.14 - 3.68)。教育水平与30岁时的超重有关,但与职业阶层无关。低学历(≤11年)的男性(OR = 1.55,95%CI 1.10 - 2.19)和女性(OR = 1.78,95%CI 1.16 - 2.73)都有超重风险。解释男性超重教育梯度的因素包括青春期父母在教育方面的支持不足,以及青年期缺乏体育活动、饮酒和不参加任何社团。女性超重的教育梯度主要由青春期因素解释,包括初潮年龄早、缺乏体育活动、父母离异、在学校不受欢迎以及学校管控不力。青年期有限的经济资源是女性超重的另一个解释因素。所有这些因素在低学历的男性和女性中比高学历者更为常见。
超重方面的社会不平等反映了从青春期到青年期经历的多种不利情况的累积影响。超重方面社会不平等的潜在途径在男性和女性之间有所不同。减少超重方面社会不平等的政策建议包括减少不同生命阶段健康行为和社会环境的社会差异,特别是青春期的心理社会环境差异。