Monticone M, Barbarino A, Testi C, Arzano S, Moschi A, Negrini S
ISICO, Italian Scientific Spine Institute, Milan, Italy.
Eura Medicophys. 2004 Dec;40(4):263-8.
Back pain is a highly frequent condition due to many causes, although most of them cannot be established with certainty. It is also the current clinical and scientific belief that sacroiliac joint syndrome can be a specific low back pain cause. Nonetheless the existence of clinical tests aimed at highlighting the responsibility for lumbar pain secondary to sacroiliac dysfunction, it is not easy to diagnose it with either manual or instrumental means. Moreover, uncertainty is diffuse when facing a correct treatment for patients involved. The aim of this study was to verify, in patients with acute or sub-acute low back pain and positive sacroiliac signs, the efficacy of a stabilising therapy (orthosis and exercises, with previous mesotherapy) directly targeted to sacroiliac dysfunction versus a symptomatic usual care such as He-Ne laser therapy.
Over a period of 14 months, we recruited 22 patients (10 females, mean age 44+/-11) with acute and sub-acute low back pain and symptoms and signs suggesting a sacroiliac dysfunction. They were randomised in a Group laser (GL), 11 patients treated with He-Ne laser therapy targeting the sacroiliac region, and a Group stabilisation (GS), 11 patients treated with mesotherapy, a specific dynamic sacroiliac support (ILSA) and specific exercises. Outcome criteria included VAS, and Mens and Laslett sacroiliac tests.
Out of 449 acute and sub-acute low back pain out-patients, 22 (4.9%) had symptoms and signs suggesting a sacroiliac dysfunction. A reduction of pain was achieved only in the GS. All pain-provocation and stability tests were negative both after the end of treatment and at the follow-up only in the GS.
A targeted approach based on mesotherapy, a specific sacroiliac belt and specific stabilizing exercises proved its efficacy in acute and sub-acute low back pain patients with symptoms and signs suggesting a sacroiliac dysfunction. As soon as it will be possible to identify particular spine syndromes in the universe of non specific low back pain, there will also be the possibility to employ specific therapies.
背痛是一种由多种原因引起的高发性疾病,尽管其中大多数病因无法确切确定。目前临床和科学界也认为,骶髂关节综合征可能是导致下背痛的一个特定原因。然而,尽管存在旨在突出骶髂功能障碍继发腰背痛责任的临床检查,但无论是通过手法还是仪器手段都不容易诊断该病。此外,在为相关患者选择正确的治疗方法时,存在诸多不确定性。本研究的目的是在患有急性或亚急性下背痛且骶髂体征阳性的患者中,验证直接针对骶髂功能障碍的稳定治疗(矫形器和运动,之前进行过中医疗法)与诸如氦氖激光治疗等对症常规治疗相比的疗效。
在14个月的时间里,我们招募了22例(10名女性,平均年龄44±11岁)患有急性和亚急性下背痛且有症状和体征提示骶髂功能障碍的患者。他们被随机分为激光组(GL),11例接受针对骶髂区域的氦氖激光治疗;稳定组(GS),11例接受中医疗法、一种特定的动态骶髂支撑(ILSA)和特定运动治疗。疗效标准包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及门氏和拉塞特骶髂关节检查。
在449例急性和亚急性下背痛门诊患者中,22例(4.9%)有症状和体征提示骶髂功能障碍。仅在稳定组中疼痛得到减轻。仅在稳定组中,治疗结束后及随访时所有疼痛激发试验和稳定性试验均为阴性。
基于中医疗法、一种特定的骶髂带和特定稳定运动的靶向治疗方法,在患有提示骶髂功能障碍症状和体征的急性和亚急性下背痛患者中证明了其疗效。一旦能够在非特异性下背痛范畴内识别出特定的脊柱综合征,也就有可能采用特定的治疗方法。