• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶劣心境障碍患者的心理健康服务利用情况:一项7.5年自然随访研究中的治疗利用与退出情况

Mental health service use by patients with dysthymic disorder: treatment use and dropout in a 7 1/2-year naturalistic follow-up study.

作者信息

McFarland Brian R, Klein Daniel N

机构信息

Psychology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2005 Jul-Aug;46(4):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.002
PMID:16175754
Abstract

Little is known about long-term treatment use among patients with dysthymia. This paper describes patterns of treatment use by 85 outpatients with dysthymic disorder and a comparison group of 36 outpatients with nonchronic (episodic) major depression in a naturalistic follow-up. Patients with dysthymia had higher rates of treatment use across 7 1/2 years compared with patients with episodic major depression. Baseline variables that predicted which patients with dysthymia dropped out of treatment before recovering from dysthymic disorder included age, ethnicity, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition Axis II pathology as obtained from informant reports, higher self-reported autonomy, and receiving psychotherapy alone as compared to receiving a combination of psychotherapy and medication. Dysthymic disorder places a significant burden on the mental health services system, yet many outpatients with dysthymia may be receiving inadequate treatment. Younger patients, ethnic minority patients, and patients with personality disorders may be at increased risk of dropping out from treatment for depression. Combination treatments may increase treatment retention.

摘要

关于心境恶劣障碍患者的长期治疗使用情况,人们了解甚少。本文描述了85例心境恶劣障碍门诊患者和36例非慢性(发作性)重度抑郁症门诊患者在自然随访中的治疗使用模式。与发作性重度抑郁症患者相比,心境恶劣障碍患者在7年半的时间里治疗使用率更高。预测哪些心境恶劣障碍患者在从心境恶劣障碍中康复之前退出治疗的基线变量包括年龄、种族、从 informant 报告中获得的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(修订第三版)》轴II病理、较高的自我报告自主性,以及与接受心理治疗和药物联合治疗相比仅接受心理治疗。心境恶劣障碍给心理健康服务系统带来了沉重负担,但许多心境恶劣障碍门诊患者可能接受的治疗不足。年轻患者、少数民族患者和患有精神障碍的患者可能退出抑郁症治疗的风险增加。联合治疗可能会提高治疗依从性。

相似文献

1
Mental health service use by patients with dysthymic disorder: treatment use and dropout in a 7 1/2-year naturalistic follow-up study.恶劣心境障碍患者的心理健康服务利用情况:一项7.5年自然随访研究中的治疗利用与退出情况
Compr Psychiatry. 2005 Jul-Aug;46(4):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.002.
2
Review of dysthymia and persistent depressive disorder: history, correlates, and clinical implications.心境恶劣障碍与持续性抑郁障碍综述:历史、相关因素及临床意义
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):801-812. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30099-7.
3
Sertraline and/or interpersonal psychotherapy for patients with dysthymic disorder in primary care: 6-month comparison with longitudinal 2-year follow-up of effectiveness and costs.基层医疗中针对恶劣心境障碍患者的舍曲林和/或人际心理治疗:6个月疗效及成本对比与2年纵向随访
J Affect Disord. 2002 Apr;68(2-3):317-30. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00343-3.
4
Ten-year prospective follow-up study of the naturalistic course of dysthymic disorder and double depression.心境恶劣障碍和双重抑郁自然病程的十年前瞻性随访研究
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):872-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.872.
5
The epidemiology of chronic major depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.慢性重度抑郁障碍和恶劣心境障碍的流行病学:来自国家酒精相关情况的流行病学调查。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;71(12):1645-56. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05663gry.
6
Five-year course and outcome of dysthymic disorder: A prospective, naturalistic follow-up study.恶劣心境障碍的五年病程及转归:一项前瞻性、自然主义的随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;157(6):931-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.931.
7
Dysthymic disorder and double depression: prediction of 10-year course trajectories and outcomes.恶劣心境障碍与双重抑郁:10年病程轨迹及转归的预测
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Apr;42(5):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
8
Outcome for adjustment disorder with depressed mood: comparison with other mood disorders.伴抑郁情绪的适应障碍的结局:与其他心境障碍的比较。
J Affect Disord. 1999 Sep;55(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00202-x.
9
Mean Beck Depression Inventory-II scores of outpatients with dysthymic or recurrent-episode major depressive disorders.恶劣心境或复发性重度抑郁症门诊患者的贝克抑郁量表第二版平均得分。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Oct;93(2):507-12. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.2.507.
10
Treatment as usual (TAU) for depression: a comparison of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and combined treatment at a large academic medical center.抑郁症的常规治疗(TAU):在大型学术医疗中心比较心理治疗、药物治疗和联合治疗。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2013 Mar;50(1):110-8. doi: 10.1037/a0031385.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of DLPFC rTMS on anhedonia and alpha asymmetry in depressed patients.背外侧前额叶重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症患者快感缺失及α波不对称性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85057-w.
2
Ethnic Identity and Mechanisms of Mental Health Service Engagement Among Young Adults with Serious Mental Illnesses.少数民族身份认同与严重精神疾病青年心理健康服务利用的机制。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3917-3929. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01842-9. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
3
Does use of primary care-based behavioral health programs differ by race and ethnicity? Evidence from a multi-site collaborative care model.
基于初级保健的行为健康项目的使用是否因种族和民族而异?来自多站点合作护理模式的证据。
Healthc (Amst). 2023 Jun;11(2):100676. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100676. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Impact of a brief intervention to improve engagement in a recovery program for young adults with serious mental illness.改善严重精神疾病青年参与康复计划的简短干预措施的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Dec;250:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in suicidal behavior and mental health service use among US adults, 2009-2020.2009-2020 年美国成年人自杀行为和精神卫生服务使用的种族和民族差异。
Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;53(12):5592-5602. doi: 10.1017/S003329172200280X. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
6
Engagement intervention versus treatment as usual for young adults with serious mental illness: a randomized pilot trial.针对患有严重精神疾病的年轻人的参与干预与常规治疗:一项随机试点试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jul 23;6:107. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00650-w. eCollection 2020.
7
An Evaluation of Racial and Ethnic Health Differences in State Mental Health Inpatient Services: 2002-2005 Versus 2010-2011.州立心理健康住院服务中的种族和族裔健康差异评估:2002 - 2005年与2010 - 2011年对比
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;44(2):242-262. doi: 10.1007/s11414-016-9539-2.
8
Cornerstone program for transition-age youth with serious mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对患有严重精神疾病的过渡年龄青年的基石项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1654-0.
9
Comparative Safety of Pharmacologic Treatments for Persistent Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.持续性抑郁障碍药物治疗的比较安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0153380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153380. eCollection 2016.
10
Medical Costs of Persons with Drug Use Disorders Among Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries in Puerto Rico : Comparison of the Direct Services Costs Incurred by Beneficiaries With and Without a Drug Use Disorder.波多黎各医疗补助管理式医疗受益人中患有药物使用障碍者的医疗费用:有药物使用障碍和无药物使用障碍受益人所产生的直接服务费用比较。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;43(2):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9469-4.