Satpute Ajay B, Fenker Daniela B, Waldmann Michael R, Tabibnia Golnaz, Holyoak Keith J, Lieberman Matthew D
Department of Psychology, 1285 Franz Hall, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Sep;22(5):1233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04292.x.
The capacity to evaluate causal relations is fundamental to human cognition, and yet little is known of its neurocognitive underpinnings. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study was performed to investigate an hypothesized dissociation between the use of semantic knowledge to evaluate specifically causal relations in contrast to general associative relations. Identical pairs of words were judged for causal or associative relations in different blocks of trials. Causal judgments, beyond associative judgments, generated distinct activation in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right pre-cuneus. These findings indicate that the evaluation of causal relations in semantic memory involves additional neural mechanisms relative to those required to evaluate associative relations.
评估因果关系的能力是人类认知的基础,但我们对其神经认知基础却知之甚少。一项功能磁共振成像研究旨在探究一种假设的解离现象,即利用语义知识评估特定因果关系与一般联想关系之间的差异。在不同的试验组块中,对相同的单词对进行因果或联想关系判断。与联想判断相比,因果判断在左侧背外侧前额叶皮层和右侧楔前叶产生了不同的激活。这些发现表明,语义记忆中因果关系的评估涉及相对于评估联想关系所需的额外神经机制。