Liang Xiuling, Xiao Feng, Wu Lijun, Chen Qingfei, Lei Yi, Li Hong
Institute for Advanced Study, Chengdu UniversityChengdu, China; Research Centre for Brain Function and Psychological Science, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen, China.
Department of Teacher Education, Shanxi Normal University Linfen, China.
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 2;7:1890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01890. eCollection 2016.
The processing of causal relations has been constantly found to be asymmetrical once the roles of cause and effect are assigned to objects in interactions. We used a relationship recognition paradigm and recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to explore the neural mechanism underlying the asymmetrical representations of causal relations in semantic memory. The results revealed that the verification of causal relations is faster if two words appear in "cause-effect" order (e.g., virus-epidemic) than if they appear in "effect-cause" order (e.g., epidemic-virus), whereas no such asymmetrical representation was found for the verification of hierarchical relations with reverse orders (e.g., bird-sparrow vs. sparrow-bird) in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the P2 amplitude elicited by "superordinate-subordinate" order was larger than that when in reverse order, whereas the N400 effect elicited by "cause-effect" order was smaller (more positive) than when in reverse order. However, no such asymmetry, as well as P2 and N400 components, were observed when verifying the existence of a general associative relation in Experiment 2. We suggested that the smaller N400 in cause-effect order indicates their increased salience in semantic memory relative to the effect-cause order. These results provide evidence for dissociable neural processes, which are related to role binding, contributing to the generation of causal asymmetry.
一旦在交互中将因果角色分配给对象,因果关系的处理就一直被发现是不对称的。我们使用关系识别范式并记录脑电图(EEG)信号,以探索语义记忆中因果关系不对称表征背后的神经机制。结果表明,如果两个词以“原因 - 结果”顺序出现(例如,病毒 - 流行病),因果关系的验证比以“结果 - 原因”顺序出现(例如,流行病 - 病毒)更快,而在实验1中,对于具有相反顺序的层次关系(例如,鸟 - 麻雀与麻雀 - 鸟)的验证未发现这种不对称表征。此外,由“上级 - 下级”顺序引发的P2波幅大于相反顺序时的波幅,而由“原因 - 结果”顺序引发的N400效应比相反顺序时更小(更正)。然而,在实验2中验证一般联想关系的存在时,未观察到这种不对称以及P2和N400成分。我们认为,因果顺序中较小的N400表明它们在语义记忆中相对于结果 - 原因顺序具有更高的显著性。这些结果为与角色绑定相关的可分离神经过程提供了证据,这些过程有助于产生因果不对称。