Roberts Evan, Cumming Jacqueline, Nelson Katherine
University of Minnesota, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Oct;62(5):503-43. doi: 10.1177/1077558705279307.
The authors review the methodology and findings of economic evaluations of 42 community mental health care programs reported in the English-language literature between 1979 and 2003. There were three substantial methodological problems in the literature: costs were often not completely specified, the quality of econometric analysis was often low, and most evaluations failed to integrate cost and health outcome information. Well-conducted research shows that care in the community dominates hospital in-patient care, achieving better outcomes at lower or equal cost. It is less clear what types of community programs are most cost-effective. Future research should focus on identifying which types of community care are most cost effective and at what level of intensity they are most effective.
作者回顾了1979年至2003年间英文文献中报道的42个社区精神卫生保健项目的经济评估方法和结果。文献中存在三个重大的方法问题:成本往往未被完全明确,计量经济学分析质量往往较低,且大多数评估未能整合成本和健康结果信息。开展良好的研究表明,社区护理优于医院住院护理,能以更低或相同的成本取得更好的结果。哪种类型的社区项目最具成本效益尚不清楚。未来的研究应侧重于确定哪种类型的社区护理最具成本效益,以及在何种强度水平下最有效。