Stierlin Annabel Sandra, Herder Katrin, Helmbrecht Marina Julia, Prinz Stefanie, Walendzik Julia, Holzmann Marco, Becker Thomas, Schützwohl Matthias, Kilian Reinhold
Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Germany.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 4;14:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-163.
Since 2009 some German health insurance companies have implemented integrated mental health care services along the principles of assertive community treatment in collaboration with local mental health service providers across Germany. Focus of this study is the analysis of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this integrated care programme compared to care as usual in routine care surroundings in five regions in Germany.
In this 18-month multi-centre observational trial 250 patients enrolled in an integrated mental health care programme and 250 patients who receive treatment as usual from five catchment areas will be included. In addition, in each group about 125 relatives of the participating patients will be included. The primary outcome criterion is the improvement of empowerment; secondary outcomes are subjective quality of life, functional impairment and costs of illness. Data will be collected at baseline and three follow-ups after 6, 12 and 18 months. Data will be analysed by means of mixed effects regression models. Propensity score methods are used for selection bias control.
Study results are expected to provide information about how integrated care programmes in their present form contribute to the improvement of mental health care. In addition, the study will provide hints to weaknesses of the current integrated care programme and options to overcome them. The major strengths of this study are the real-world character of the study intervention with a simultaneous high level of academic rigour. However, the fact that patients are not randomised to study groups and that there is no blinding might limit the study.
German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111.
自2009年以来,一些德国健康保险公司与德国各地的当地精神卫生服务提供商合作,按照积极社区治疗的原则实施了综合精神卫生保健服务。本研究的重点是分析与德国五个地区常规护理环境中的常规护理相比,这种综合护理计划的有效性和成本效益。
在这项为期18个月的多中心观察性试验中,将纳入250名参加综合精神卫生保健计划的患者和250名来自五个集水区接受常规治疗的患者。此外,每组将纳入约125名参与患者的亲属。主要结局标准是赋权的改善;次要结局是主观生活质量、功能损害和疾病成本。将在基线以及6个月、12个月和18个月后的三次随访中收集数据。将通过混合效应回归模型分析数据。倾向评分方法用于控制选择偏倚。
研究结果有望提供有关当前形式的综合护理计划如何有助于改善精神卫生保健的信息。此外,该研究将指出当前综合护理计划的弱点以及克服这些弱点的选择。本研究的主要优势在于研究干预具有现实世界特征,同时具有较高的学术严谨性。然而,患者未随机分配到研究组且没有设盲这一事实可能会限制该研究。
德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00005111。