Dror David Mark, Koren Ruth, Steinberg David Mark
Erasmus University Rotterdam/MC, Institute for Health Policy and Management, Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2006 Aug;77(3):304-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
This study aims to assess the impact of being insured by micro-health insurance units (MIUs) on equality of access to health care among groups with inequitable income distribution. We measure equality by relating income with access to healthcare. The analysis is based on a household survey conducted in five regions in the Philippines in 2002.
We generated concentration curves and indices (CI) for insured and uninsured households (150 for each cohort in each region). We also elaborated a method to retain the relative income rank of households when data were aggregated across regions, as the regions had quite different nominal income levels.
We found a significant effect of household income on access to hospitalizations among the uninsured households (a positive CI), but no such effect among the insured households (CI close to zero). As regards professionally attended deliveries, an increased tendency of poorer households to deliver at home (CI slightly negative) and a lower rate of deliveries in hospital (CI slightly positive and statistically significant) were reported by both uninsured and insured households. Access to consultations was unrelated to income among the insured (CI close to 0), but negatively correlated with income among the uninsured (a positive and significant CI).
We conclude that MIUs in Philippines improve income-related equality of access to hospitalization and medical consultation in cases of illness. The findings of this study strengthen a claim for government support for the operation of MIUs as successful (albeit micro) suppliers of health insurance.
本研究旨在评估加入小额健康保险机构(MIUs)对收入分配不均群体获得医疗保健平等性的影响。我们通过将收入与获得医疗保健的机会联系起来衡量平等性。该分析基于2002年在菲律宾五个地区进行的一项家庭调查。
我们为参保家庭和未参保家庭生成了集中曲线和指数(CI)(每个地区每个队列各150个)。我们还精心设计了一种方法,在跨地区汇总数据时保留家庭的相对收入排名,因为各地区的名义收入水平差异很大。
我们发现家庭收入对未参保家庭的住院机会有显著影响(CI为正),但对参保家庭没有这种影响(CI接近零)。关于专业人员接生,未参保家庭和参保家庭均报告,较贫困家庭在家分娩的趋势增加(CI略为负),而在医院分娩的比例较低(CI略为正且具有统计学意义)。参保人群获得会诊的机会与收入无关(CI接近0),但未参保人群获得会诊的机会与收入呈负相关(CI为正且显著)。
我们得出结论,菲律宾的小额健康保险机构在患病情况下改善了与收入相关的住院和医疗会诊机会平等性。本研究结果支持了一项主张,即政府应支持小额健康保险机构作为成功的(尽管规模较小)健康保险供应商开展业务。