Ranson M Kent, Sinha Tara, Chatterjee Mirai, Gandhi Fenil, Jayswal Rupal, Patel Falguni, Morris Saul S, Mills Anne J
Health Economics and Financing Programme, Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT.
BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39192.719583.AE. Epub 2007 May 25.
To evaluate alternative strategies for improving the uptake of benefits of a community based health insurance scheme by its poorest members.
Prospective cluster randomised controlled trial.
Self Employed Women's Association (SEWA) community based health insurance scheme in rural India. Participants 713 claimants at baseline (2003) and 1440 claimants two years later among scheme members in 16 rural sub-districts.
After sales service with supportive supervision, prospective reimbursement, both packages, and neither package, randomised by sub-district.
The primary outcome was socioeconomic status of claimants relative to members living in the same sub-district. Secondary outcomes were enrolment rates in SEWA Insurance, mean socioeconomic status of the insured population relative to the general rural population, and rate of claim submission.
Between 2003 and 2005, the mean socioeconomic status of SEWA Insurance members (relative to the rural population of Gujarat) increased significantly. Rates of claims also increased significantly, on average by 21.6 per 1000 members (P<0.001). However, differences between the intervention groups and the standard scheme were not significant. No systematic effect of time or interventions on the socioeconomic status of claimants relative to members in the same sub-district was found.
Neither intervention was sufficient to ensure that the poorer members in each sub-district were able to enjoy the greater share of the scheme benefits. Claim submission increased as a result of interventions that seem to have strengthened awareness of and trust in a community based health insurance scheme. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00421629.
评估改善社区医疗保险计划中最贫困成员受益情况的替代策略。
前瞻性整群随机对照试验。
印度农村地区自营职业妇女协会(SEWA)的社区医疗保险计划。参与者为16个农村分区中该计划成员在基线时(2003年)的713名索赔者以及两年后的1440名索赔者。
售后支持性监督服务、前瞻性报销、两种方案都采用、两种方案都不采用,按分区随机分配。
主要观察指标是索赔者相对于居住在同一分区的成员的社会经济状况。次要观察指标是SEWA保险的参保率、参保人群相对于农村总人口的平均社会经济状况以及索赔提交率。
2003年至2005年期间,SEWA保险成员的平均社会经济状况(相对于古吉拉特邦农村人口)显著提高。索赔率也显著上升,平均每1000名成员增加21.6例(P<0.001)。然而,干预组与标准方案之间的差异不显著。未发现时间或干预措施对索赔者相对于同一分区成员的社会经济状况有系统性影响。
两种干预措施都不足以确保每个分区中较贫困的成员能够更多地享受该计划的福利。由于干预措施似乎增强了对社区医疗保险计划的认识和信任,索赔提交有所增加。试验注册临床试验编号NCT00421629。