• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者还是研究对象?一项关于参与复杂干预随机对照试验的定性研究。

Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.

作者信息

Heaven Ben, Murtagh Madeleine, Rapley Tim, May Carl, Graham Ruth, Kaner Eileen, Thomson Richard

机构信息

Health Technologies and Human Relations Research Group, Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):260-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.013
PMID:16181766
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore participants' understandings regarding treatment decisions, made within an efficacy randomised controlled trial (RCT) of decision-support tools.

METHODS

Qualitative study: interviews (audio-recorded) with participants. Participants were interviewed 3-5 days after using a decision-support tool (n=30) and again at 3 months (n=26). Transcripts were analysed using a constant comparative approach.

RESULTS

Participants' understandings were shaped by the ways in which they made sense of their participation. Participants made attributions about their trial identity that fell on a continuum. At one end we found participants who identified as 'experienced medical volunteers', and at the other those who identified as 'real patients'. In the participants' accounts, a trial identity of 'patient' accompanied an expectation that the decision-support tools offered a means of making treatment decisions. 'Volunteers', however, saw the interventions as tasks to be completed for the purposes of the trial team.

CONCLUSION

In our study, trial identity shaped participants' understandings regarding treatment decisions and all other aspects of the trial.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Different understandings regarding the appropriate response to trial tasks may affect behaviour and therefore outcomes in some trials. Further research is required to unravel the relationship between trial identities, understanding and behaviour.

摘要

目的

探讨在决策支持工具的疗效随机对照试验(RCT)中参与者对治疗决策的理解。

方法

定性研究:对参与者进行访谈(录音)。参与者在使用决策支持工具后3 - 5天接受访谈(n = 30),并在3个月时再次接受访谈(n = 26)。使用持续比较法对访谈记录进行分析。

结果

参与者的理解受到他们对自身参与的理解方式的影响。参与者对自己的试验身份做出的归因处于一个连续体上。一端是将自己视为“经验丰富的医学志愿者”的参与者,另一端是将自己视为“真正患者”的参与者。在参与者的描述中,“患者”的试验身份伴随着一种期望,即决策支持工具提供了一种做出治疗决策的方式。然而,“志愿者”将干预措施视为为试验团队完成的任务。

结论

在我们的研究中,试验身份塑造了参与者对治疗决策以及试验所有其他方面的理解。

实践意义

对试验任务的适当反应的不同理解可能会影响行为,进而影响某些试验的结果。需要进一步研究以阐明试验身份、理解和行为之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.患者还是研究对象?一项关于参与复杂干预随机对照试验的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):260-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
2
Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self.参与随机对照试验的原因:有条件的利他主义和自我考虑。
Trials. 2010 Mar 22;11:31. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-31.
3
Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy.在危急情况下参与试验:一项关于妊娠的定性研究
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):98-101. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015636.
4
Patients or volunteers? The impact of motivation for trial participation on the efficacy of patient decision Aids: a secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.患者还是志愿者?试验参与动机对患者决策辅助工具疗效的影响:Cochrane系统评价的二次分析
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):419-35. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15579172.
5
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
6
Factors determining participation in prevention trials among systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a qualitative study.系统性红斑狼疮患者参与预防试验的决定因素:一项定性研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):49-55. doi: 10.1002/art.22480.
7
Pregnant womens' concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study.受邀参加随机试验时孕妇的顾虑:一项定性病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 4;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x.
8
Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial.决定参加围产随机对照试验:Magpie 试验中纳入的孕妇的经验和观点。
Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):E478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
Participating in research: exploring participation and engagement in a study of self-management for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.参与研究:探索参与一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理的研究的情况。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1273-82. doi: 10.1177/1049732311405216. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
10
South Asian patients' views and experiences of clinical trial participation.南亚患者对参与临床试验的看法和经历。
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):636-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh611. Epub 2004 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
"There is nothing better than participating in this study": Living the PAPAartis cardiovascular randomised controlled trial.“没有什么比参与这项研究更好的了”:亲历PAPAartis心血管随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Sep 3;29:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100987. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Motivations and barriers for healthy participants to participate in herbal remedy clinical trial in Tanzania: A qualitative study based on the theory of planned behaviour.坦桑尼亚健康参与者参与草药疗法临床试验的动机和障碍:基于计划行为理论的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271828. eCollection 2022.
3
Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge.
打破患者化进程——通过共同创造护理,利用古老的北极生存知识。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1926052. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1926052.
4
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.患者决策辅助工具评估报告的标准化通用解释和阐述(SUNDAE)指南:来自患者决策辅助工具评估文献中报告 SUNDAE 项目的示例。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression.使用队列多重随机对照试验设计来测试抑郁症干预措施的益处与挑战。
Trials. 2017 Jul 6;18(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4.
7
Shedding light on research participation effects in behaviour change trials: a qualitative study examining research participant experiences.揭示行为改变试验中研究参与的影响:一项审视研究参与者经历的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 29;16:91. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2741-6.
8
How experiences become data: the process of eliciting adverse event, medical history and concomitant medication reports in antimalarial and antiretroviral interaction trials.经验如何成为数据:在抗疟和抗逆转录病毒相互作用试验中引出不良事件、医疗史和伴随用药报告的过程。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Nov 14;13:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-140.
9
Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.走后门获取医疗服务:一项定性访谈研究,旨在调查加拿大民众参与健康研究的原因。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Oct 12;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-40.
10
Mixing a grounded theory approach with a randomized controlled trial related to intimate partner violence: what challenges arise for mixed methods research?将扎根理论方法与一项关于亲密伴侣暴力的随机对照试验相结合:混合方法研究面临哪些挑战?
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:798213. doi: 10.1155/2013/798213. Epub 2013 Mar 20.