Suppr超能文献

非特异性腹痛评估临床指南的制定:急诊环境下腹痛指南(GAPEDS)第1阶段研究

Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the Guideline for Abdominal Pain in the ED Setting (GAPEDS) Phase 1 Study.

作者信息

Gerhardt Robert T, Nelson Brian K, Keenan Sean, Kernan Leah, MacKersie Andrew, Lane Michael S

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center/San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;23(6):709-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.01.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify a clinical guideline for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) using history, physical examination, laboratory analysis, acute abdominal series (AAS) radiographs, and nonenhanced helical computed tomography (NHCT) clinical predictor variables (CPVs).

SETTING

The setting of this study was at an urban emergency department (ED) with 70,000 yearly visits.

METHODS

This is an institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational study. The primary outcome variable was urgent intervention (UI), defined as a diagnosis requiring surgical or medical treatment to prevent death or major morbidity. Subjects underwent prompted history, physical, laboratory studies, AAS, and NHCT and were followed up to 6 months for ultimate diagnosis and outcome. CPVs were subjected to classification and regression tree analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-five subjects were analyzed. Thirteen percent of subjects required UI within 24 hours of presentation; an additional 34% underwent elective interventions that mitigated morbidity or mortality. Four guideline models were generated. Model 1 consisted of history and physical, with a sensitivity of 25%, a specificity of 92%, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.17, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.81. Model 2 consisted of model 1 with laboratory, with a sensitivity of 39%, a specificity of 88%, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.25, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.69. Model 3 consisted of model 2 with AAS, with a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 81%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.94, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.54. Model 4 comprised all inputs, including NHCT, with a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 90%, a positive likelihood ratio of 9.2, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.089. NHCT was the single most accurate CPV for UI.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinical guideline was identified exclusive of NHCT that possessed adequate sensitivity for exclusion of UI. NHCT is a rational choice for decision support in the evaluation of NSAP and is likely the single most useful diagnostic adjunct available to augment the clinical evaluation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定一项临床指南,用于通过病史、体格检查、实验室分析、腹部急症系列(AAS)X线片以及非增强螺旋计算机断层扫描(NHCT)的临床预测变量(CPV)来评估非特异性腹痛(NSAP)。

背景

本研究在一家年就诊量达70000人次的城市急诊科开展。

方法

这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性观察性研究。主要结局变量为紧急干预(UI),定义为需要进行手术或药物治疗以预防死亡或严重并发症的诊断。研究对象接受了及时的病史采集、体格检查、实验室检查、AAS及NHCT,并随访6个月以确定最终诊断和结局。对CPV进行分类和回归树分析。

结果

共分析了165名研究对象。13%的研究对象在就诊后24小时内需要紧急干预;另有34%接受了择期干预,这些干预降低了发病率或死亡率。生成了四种指南模型。模型1包括病史和体格检查,灵敏度为25%,特异度为92%,阳性似然比为3.17,阴性似然比为0.81。模型2在模型1的基础上增加了实验室检查,灵敏度为39%,特异度为88%,阳性似然比为3.25,阴性似然比为0.69。模型3在模型2的基础上增加了AAS,灵敏度为56%,特异度为81%,阳性似然比为2.94,阴性似然比为0.54。模型4包含所有输入项(包括NHCT),灵敏度为92%,特异度为90%,阳性似然比为9.2,阴性似然比为0.089。NHCT是预测紧急干预的最准确的单一CPV。

结论

未发现不包括NHCT且对排除紧急干预具有足够灵敏度的临床指南。NHCT是评估NSAP时进行决策支持的合理选择,很可能是用于加强临床评估的最有用的单一诊断辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验