Uedo Noriya, Iishi Hiroyasu, Tatsuta Masaharu, Yamada Takuya, Ogiyama Hideharu, Imanaka Kazuho, Sugimoto Naotoshi, Higashino Koji, Ishihara Ryu, Narahara Hiroyuki, Ishiguro Shingo
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Oct;62(4):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.031.
Image quality of the prior autofluorescence (AF) imaging systems, including the fiber-optic endoscope, was not feasible for general clinical use. The use of AF image alone resulted in low specificity. The objective of the study was to evaluate the resolution and the sensitivity of the novel videoendoscopy system by using AF and reflectance imaging (AFI) in the diagnosis of early esophagogastric cancers.
This was a case series study. The setting was a pretreatment examination at a cancer center. Five patients with superficial esophageal cancers (SEC) and 21 patients with 22 early gastric cancers (EGC) were included in the study. The extent of the tumors was diagnosed by white light (WL), AF and chromoendoscopic observations. The main outcome measurement was the diagnostic accuracy of each observation in relation to the histologic mapping as a criterion standard.
Two of 5 SECs (40%) were correctly diagnosed in the WL image and all (100%) in the AF image as purple or magenta color in a green background. EGCs in atrophic mucosa were observed as purple or magenta areas in a green background, while diffuse-type EGCs in fundic mucosa were observed as green areas in a purple background. Of the 22 EGCs, diagnostic accuracy of WL, AF, and chromoendoscopic observations were 36%: 95% CI [16%, 56%], 68%: 95% CI [49%, 88%], and 91%: 95% CI [79%, 100%], respectively. AFI could reveal flat or isochromatic extensions that were not detected in the WL images. The limitations of the study were ulcerations or inflammation that caused overdiagnosis in the AF observation.
The resolution of the AFI at present is limited, but the image quality was acceptable. The current system of AFI does not equal to chromoendoscopy in sensitivity but has an advantage over standard WL videoendoscopy.
包括光纤内窥镜在内的既往自体荧光(AF)成像系统的图像质量,并不适用于一般临床应用。单独使用AF图像会导致特异性较低。本研究的目的是通过使用AF和反射成像(AFI)来评估新型视频内窥镜系统在早期食管胃癌诊断中的分辨率和敏感性。
这是一项病例系列研究。研究场景为癌症中心的预处理检查。本研究纳入了5例浅表性食管癌(SEC)患者和21例患有22处早期胃癌(EGC)的患者。通过白光(WL)、AF和色素内镜观察来诊断肿瘤范围。主要结局指标是将每种观察结果与组织学定位作为标准对照时的诊断准确性。
5例SEC中有2例(40%)在WL图像中被正确诊断,而在AF图像中所有病例(100%)均被正确诊断,表现为绿色背景下的紫色或品红色。萎缩性黏膜中的EGC表现为绿色背景下的紫色或品红色区域,而胃底黏膜中的弥漫型EGC表现为紫色背景下的绿色区域。在22处EGC中,WL、AF和色素内镜观察的诊断准确性分别为36%:95%置信区间[16%,56%]、68%:95%置信区间[49%,88%]和91%:95%置信区间[79%,100%]。AFI能够显示WL图像中未检测到的平坦或同色延伸。本研究的局限性在于溃疡或炎症会导致AF观察中的过度诊断。
目前AFI的分辨率有限,但图像质量尚可接受。当前的AFI系统在敏感性上虽不及色素内镜,但优于标准的WL视频内窥镜检查。