Suppr超能文献

经鼻内镜检查结合窄带成像和卢戈氏染色,用于筛查因病情限制无法使用标准(带视频)内镜进行口腔插管的头颈癌患者。

Transnasal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and Lugol staining to screen patients with head and neck cancer whose condition limits oral intubation with standard endoscope (with video).

作者信息

Lee Yi-Chia, Wang Cheng-Ping, Chen Chien-Chuan, Chiu Han-Mo, Ko Jenq-Yuh, Lou Pei-Jen, Yang Tsung-Lin, Huang Hsin-Yi, Wu Ming-Shiang, Lin Jaw-Town, Hsiu-Hsi Chen Tony, Wang Hsiu-Po

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Division of Biostatistics, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):408-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.033. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of esophageal cancer in patients with head and neck cancers may alter treatment planning and improve survival. However, standard endoscopic screening is not feasible for some patients with tumor-related airway compromise or postirradiation trismus.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a novel, sequential approach by integrating ultrathin endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single center in Taiwan.

PATIENTS

Forty-four consecutive patients with transoral difficulty screened for synchronous or metachronous esophageal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of mucosal high-grade neoplasia or invasive cancer.

RESULTS

Fifty-four endoscopic interpretations were obtained, and 11 mucosal high-grade neoplasia and 7 invasive cancers were confirmed by histology. The mean examination time was 19.4 minutes (range 7.9-35.2 minutes), and all patients tolerated the procedure well. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (with 95% CI) were 55.6% (95% CI, 33.5%-75.6%), 97.2% (95% CI, 85.8%-99.3%), and 83.3% (95% CI, 71.2%-90.9%), respectively, for standard endoscopy; 88.9% (95% CI, 66.9%-96.6%), 97.2% (95% CI, 85.8%-99.3%), and 94.4% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.9%), respectively, with the adjunct of narrow-band imaging; and 88.9% (95% CI, 66.9%-96.6%), 72.2% (95% CI, 55.9%-84.1%), and 77.8% (95% CI, 64.9%-86.8%), respectively, with the adjunct of Lugol chromoendoscopy. When we integrated all interpretations on the basis of the sequential approach, the estimated probability of false-negative findings was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.6%).

LIMITATIONS

Inherent shortcomings of ultrathin endoscopy, such as its resolution, light source, and lack of magnification.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrathin endoscopy in a sequential approach for multimodal detection is feasible in patients with transoral difficulty and substantially increases the detection rate of synchronous or metachronous neoplasms.

摘要

背景

对头颈部癌症患者进行食管癌的早期检测可能会改变治疗方案并提高生存率。然而,对于一些因肿瘤导致气道受损或放疗后牙关紧闭的患者,标准的内镜筛查并不可行。

目的

评估一种将超薄内镜与窄带成像及卢戈氏染色内镜相结合的新型序贯方法。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

台湾的一家单中心。

患者

连续44例经口困难患者接受同步或异时性食管癌筛查。

主要观察指标

检测黏膜高级别瘤变或浸润性癌的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

共获得54次内镜检查结果,经组织学证实有11例黏膜高级别瘤变和7例浸润性癌。平均检查时间为19.4分钟(范围7.9 - 35.2分钟),所有患者对该操作耐受性良好。标准内镜检查的敏感性、特异性和准确性(95%置信区间)分别为55.6%(95% CI,33.5% - 75.6%)、97.2%(95% CI,85.8% - 99.3%)和83.3%(95% CI,71.2% - 90.9%);窄带成像辅助检查时分别为88.9%(95% CI,66.9% - 96.6%)、97.2%(95% CI,85.8% - 99.3%)和94.4%(95% CI,84.9% - 97.9%);卢戈氏染色内镜辅助检查时分别为88.9%(95% CI,66.9% - 96.6%)、72.2%(95% CI,55.9% - 84.1%)和77.8%(95% CI,64.9% - 86.8%)。当我们基于序贯方法整合所有检查结果时,假阴性结果的估计概率为1.2%(95% CI,0.1% - 4.6%)。

局限性

超薄内镜存在固有缺点,如分辨率、光源以及缺乏放大功能。

结论

对于经口困难的患者,采用序贯方法使用超薄内镜进行多模态检测是可行的,并且能显著提高同步或异时性肿瘤的检出率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验