Majerus Steve, Gill-Thwaites Helen, Andrews Keith, Laureys Steven
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Liege, Belgium.
Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:397-413. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50028-1.
This paper reviews the current state of bedside behavioral assessment in brain-damaged patients with impaired consciousness (coma, vegetative state, minimally conscious state). As misdiagnosis in this field is unfortunately very frequent, we first discuss a number of fundamental principles of clinical evaluation that should guide the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients in order to avoid confusion between vegetative state and minimally conscious state. The role of standardized behavioral assessment tools is particularly stressed. The second part of this paper reviews existing behavioral assessment techniques of consciousness, showing that there are actually a large number of these scales. After a discussion of the most widely used scale, the Glasgow Coma Scale, we present several new promising tools that show higher sensitivity and reliability for detecting subtle signs of recovery of consciousness in the post-acute setting.
本文综述了意识受损(昏迷、植物状态、微意识状态)的脑损伤患者床边行为评估的现状。遗憾的是,该领域的误诊非常常见,因此我们首先讨论一些临床评估的基本原则,这些原则应指导对脑损伤患者意识的评估,以避免植物状态和微意识状态之间的混淆。特别强调了标准化行为评估工具的作用。本文的第二部分综述了现有的意识行为评估技术,表明这类量表实际上有很多。在讨论了使用最广泛的量表——格拉斯哥昏迷量表后,我们介绍了几种新的、有前景的工具,这些工具在检测急性后期意识恢复的细微迹象方面具有更高的敏感性和可靠性。