Eurich Dean T, Majumdar Sumit R, McAlister Finlay A, Tsuyuki Ross T, Johnson Jeffrey A
Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2345-51. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2345.
Metformin is considered contraindicated in patients with heart failure because of concerns over lactic acidosis, despite increasing evidence of potential benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between metformin and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes.
Using the Saskatchewan Health databases, 12,272 new users of oral antidiabetic agents were identified between the years 1991 and 1996. Subjects with incident heart failure (n = 1,833) were identified through administrative records based on ICD-9 code 428 and grouped according to antidiabetic therapy: metformin monotherapy (n = 208), sulfonylurea monotherapy (n = 773), or combination therapy (n = 852). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess differences in all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and the combination (i.e., all-cause hospitalization or mortality).
Average age of subjects was 72 years, 57% were male, and average follow-up was 2.5 +/- 2.0 (SD) years. Compared with sulfonylurea therapy, fewer deaths occurred in subjects receiving metformin: 404 (52%) for sulfonylurea monotherapy versus 69 (33%) for metformin monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.91]) and 263 (31%) for combination therapy (0.61 [0.52-0.72]). A reduction in deaths or hospitalizations was also observed: 658 (85%) for sulfonylurea monotherapy versus 160 (77%) for metformin monotherapy (0.83 [0.70-0.99]) and 681 (80%) for combination therapy (0.86 [0.77-0.96]). There was no difference in time to first hospitalization between study groups.
Metformin, alone or in combination, in subjects with heart failure and type 2 diabetes was associated with lower morbidity and mortality compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy.
尽管越来越多的证据表明二甲双胍可能有益,但由于担心乳酸性酸中毒,心力衰竭患者被认为禁用二甲双胍。本研究的目的是评估二甲双胍与心力衰竭合并2型糖尿病患者临床结局之间的关联。
利用萨斯喀彻温省卫生数据库,在1991年至1996年期间确定了12272名口服抗糖尿病药物新使用者。通过基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码428的行政记录确定新发心力衰竭患者(n = 1833),并根据抗糖尿病治疗方法分组:二甲双胍单药治疗(n = 208)、磺脲类单药治疗(n = 773)或联合治疗(n = 852)。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估全因死亡率、全因住院率以及两者合并情况(即全因住院或死亡)的差异。
受试者平均年龄为72岁,57%为男性,平均随访时间为2.5±2.0(标准差)年。与磺脲类治疗相比,接受二甲双胍治疗的受试者死亡人数较少:磺脲类单药治疗组有404人(52%)死亡,而二甲双胍单药治疗组有69人(33%)死亡(风险比[HR] 0.70 [95%置信区间0.54 - 0.91]),联合治疗组有263人(31%)死亡(0.61 [0.52 - 0.72])。还观察到死亡或住院人数减少:磺脲类单药治疗组为658人(85%),二甲双胍单药治疗组为160人(77%)(0.83 [0.70 - 0.99]),联合治疗组为681人(80%)(0.86 [0.77 - 0.96])。各研究组首次住院时间无差异。
与磺脲类单药治疗相比,心力衰竭合并2型糖尿病患者单独使用或联合使用二甲双胍与较低的发病率和死亡率相关。