Imazio Massimo, Bobbio Marco, Cecchi Enrico, Demarie Daniela, Demichelis Brunella, Pomari Franco, Moratti Mauro, Gaschino Gianni, Giammaria Massimo, Ghisio Aldo, Belli Riccardo, Trinchero Rita
Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):2012-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.542738.
Colchicine is effective and safe for the treatment and prevention of recurrent pericarditis and might ultimately serve as the initial mode of treatment, especially in idiopathic cases. The aim of this work was to verify the safety and efficacy of colchicine as an adjunct to conventional therapy for the treatment of the first episode of acute pericarditis.
A prospective, randomized, open-label design was used. A total of 120 patients (mean age 56.9+/-18.8 years, 54 males) with a first episode of acute pericarditis (idiopathic, viral, postpericardiotomy syndromes, and connective tissue diseases) were randomly assigned to conventional treatment with aspirin (group I) or conventional treatment plus colchicine 1.0 to 2.0 mg for the first day and then 0.5 to 1.0 mg/d for 3 months (group II). Corticosteroid therapy was restricted to patients with aspirin contraindications or intolerance. The primary end point was recurrence rate. During the 2873 patient-month follow-up, colchicine significantly reduced the recurrence rate (recurrence rates at 18 months were, respectively, 10.7% versus 32.3%; P=0.004; number needed to treat=5) and symptom persistence at 72 hours (respectively, 11.7% versus 36.7%; P=0.003). After multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.21 to 15.25; P=0.024) was an independent risk factor for recurrences. Colchicine was discontinued in 5 cases (8.3%) because of diarrhea. No serious adverse effects were observed.
Colchicine plus conventional therapy led to a clinically important and statistically significant benefit over conventional treatment, decreasing the recurrence rate in patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis. Corticosteroid therapy given in the index attack can favor the occurrence of recurrences.
秋水仙碱对于复发性心包炎的治疗和预防有效且安全,最终可能会成为初始治疗方式,尤其是在特发性病例中。本研究的目的是验证秋水仙碱作为传统疗法辅助药物治疗急性心包炎首发症状的安全性和有效性。
采用前瞻性、随机、开放标签设计。总共120例急性心包炎首发患者(平均年龄56.9±18.8岁,男性54例)(特发性、病毒性、心包切开术后综合征和结缔组织病)被随机分配至阿司匹林传统治疗组(I组)或传统治疗加秋水仙碱组(II组),秋水仙碱首日剂量为1.0至2.0毫克,之后3个月每日剂量为0.5至1.0毫克。皮质类固醇疗法仅限于阿司匹林禁忌或不耐受的患者。主要终点是复发率。在2873患者-月的随访期间,秋水仙碱显著降低了复发率(18个月时的复发率分别为10.7%对32.3%;P=0.004;需治疗人数=5)以及72小时时症状持续存在的情况(分别为11.7%对36.7%;P=0.003)。多因素分析后,使用皮质类固醇(比值比4.30,95%置信区间1.21至15.25;P=0.024)是复发的独立危险因素。5例(8.3%)患者因腹泻停用秋水仙碱。未观察到严重不良反应。
秋水仙碱联合传统疗法相较于传统治疗在临床上具有重要意义且在统计学上有显著益处,降低了急性心包炎首发患者的复发率。在首次发作时给予皮质类固醇疗法可能会增加复发的发生。