Suppr超能文献

秋水仙碱作为复发性心包炎的首选治疗方法:CORE(复发性心包炎的秋水仙碱治疗)试验结果

Colchicine as first-choice therapy for recurrent pericarditis: results of the CORE (COlchicine for REcurrent pericarditis) trial.

作者信息

Imazio Massimo, Bobbio Marco, Cecchi Enrico, Demarie Daniela, Pomari Franco, Moratti Mauro, Ghisio Aldo, Belli Riccardo, Trinchero Rita

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 26;165(17):1987-91. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.17.1987.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colchicine seems to be a good drug for treating recurrences of pericarditis after conventional treatment failure, but no clinical trial has tested the effects of colchicine as first-line drug for the treatment of the first recurrence of pericarditis.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label design was used to investigate the safety and efficacy of colchicine therapy as adjunct to conventional therapy for the first episode of recurrent pericarditis. Eighty-four consecutive patients with a first episode of recurrent pericarditis were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment with aspirin alone or conventional treatment plus colchicine (1.0-2.0 mg the first day and then 0.5-1.0 mg/d for 6 months). When aspirin was contraindicated, prednisone (1.0-1.5 mg/kg daily) was given for 1 month and then was gradually tapered. The primary end point was the recurrence rate. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed by treatment group.

RESULTS

During 1682 patient-months (mean follow-up, 20 months), treatment with colchicine significantly decreased the recurrence rate (actuarial rates at 18 months were 24.0% vs 50.6%; P = .02; number needed to treat = 4.0; 95% confidence interval 2.5-7.1) and symptom persistence at 72 hours (10% vs 31%; P = .03). In multivariate analysis, previous corticosteroid use was an independent risk factor for further recurrences (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-8.26; P = .04). No serious adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Colchicine therapy led to a clinically important and statistically significant benefit over conventional treatment, decreasing the recurrence rate in patients with a first episode of recurrent pericarditis.

摘要

背景

秋水仙碱似乎是治疗常规治疗失败后复发性心包炎的有效药物,但尚无临床试验测试秋水仙碱作为一线药物治疗首次复发性心包炎的效果。

方法

采用前瞻性、随机、开放标签设计,研究秋水仙碱作为辅助常规治疗首次复发性心包炎发作的安全性和有效性。84例连续的首次复发性心包炎患者被随机分配接受单独使用阿司匹林的常规治疗或常规治疗加秋水仙碱(第1天1.0 - 2.0毫克,然后0.5 - 1.0毫克/天,共6个月)。当阿司匹林禁忌时,给予泼尼松(每日1.0 - 1.5毫克/千克)1个月,然后逐渐减量。主要终点是复发率。按治疗组进行意向性分析。

结果

在1682患者 - 月(平均随访20个月)期间,秋水仙碱治疗显著降低了复发率(18个月时精算率分别为24.0%对50.6%;P = 0.02;需治疗人数 = 4.0;95%置信区间2.5 - 7.1)以及72小时时症状持续存在率(10%对31%;P = 0.03)。在多变量分析中,既往使用皮质类固醇是进一步复发的独立危险因素(比值比,2.89;95%置信区间,1.10 - 8.26;P = 0.04)。未观察到严重不良反应。

结论

与常规治疗相比,秋水仙碱治疗带来了具有临床重要性且在统计学上有显著意义的益处,降低了首次复发性心包炎患者的复发率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验