Farzianpour Fereshteh, Monzavi Abbas, Yassini Esmaeil
Assistant Professor, Department of Health care Management, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Spring;8(2):71-9.
Educational evaluation is a process which deals with data collection and assessment of academic activities' progress. In this research, educational evaluation of Dentistry School of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, which trains students in undergraduate and residency courses, was studied.
This descriptive study was done with a model of educational evaluation in ten steps and 13 fields including purposes and mission objectives, management and organization, academic board members, students, human resources and support, educational, research, health and treatment spaces, educational, diagnostic, research and laboratory tools, educational, research, health and treatment programs and courses, process of teaching and learning, evaluation and assessment, alumni, and patients satisfaction. Data were collected using observation, interviews, questionnaires, and checklists.
Results of the study were mainly qualitative and in some cases quantitative, based on defined optimal situation. The total mean of qualitative results of educational evaluation of dentistry school in all 13 fields was 55.98% which is relatively desirable. In the case of quantitative ones, results of some fields such as treatment quality of patients and education and learning of the students were relatively desirable (61.32% and 60.16% respectively).
According to the results, educational goals and missions, educational and research facilities and spaces which were identified as the weakest areas need to be considered and paid more serious attention.
教育评估是一个涉及数据收集和学术活动进展评估的过程。在本研究中,对德黑兰医科大学牙科学院的教育评估进行了研究,该学院负责本科和住院医师课程的学生培训。
本描述性研究采用了一个包含十个步骤和13个领域的教育评估模型,这些领域包括目的和使命目标、管理与组织、学术委员会成员、学生、人力资源与支持、教育、研究、健康与治疗空间、教育、诊断、研究与实验室工具、教育、研究、健康与治疗计划及课程、教学过程、评估与评价、校友以及患者满意度。数据通过观察、访谈、问卷调查和清单收集。
根据定义的最佳情况,研究结果主要是定性的,在某些情况下是定量的。牙科学院教育评估所有13个领域的定性结果总平均值为55.98%,这相对较为理想。在定量方面,患者治疗质量和学生教育与学习等一些领域的结果相对理想(分别为61.32%和60.16%)。
根据研究结果,被确定为最薄弱领域的教育目标和使命、教育与研究设施及空间需要得到考虑并给予更认真的关注。