Graña Osvaldo, Baker David, MacCallum Robert M, Meiler Jens, Punta Marco, Rost Burkhard, Tress Michael L, Valencia Alfonso
Protein Design Group, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia (CNB-CSIC), C/Darwin 3, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
University of Washington, Department of Biochemistry, Seattle, Washington.
Proteins. 2005;61 Suppl 7:214-224. doi: 10.1002/prot.20739.
Here we present the evaluation results of the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP6) contact prediction category. Contact prediction was assessed with standard measures well known in the field and the performance of specialist groups was evaluated alongside groups that submitted models with 3D coordinates. The evaluation was mainly focused on long range contact predictions for the set of new fold targets, although we analyzed predictions for all targets. Three groups with similar levels of accuracy and coverage performed a little better than the others. Comparisons of the predictions of the three best methods with those of CASP5/CAFASP3 suggested some improvement, although there were not enough targets in the comparisons to make this statistically significant.
在此,我们展示蛋白质结构预测关键评估(CASP6)接触预测类别的评估结果。采用该领域熟知的标准方法评估接触预测,并将专业团队的表现与提交具有三维坐标模型的团队的表现一同进行评估。评估主要集中于对新折叠靶点集的长程接触预测,不过我们也分析了所有靶点的预测情况。三个在准确性和覆盖率方面水平相近的团队表现略优于其他团队。将三种最佳方法的预测结果与CASP5/CAFASP3的预测结果进行比较,结果显示有一定改进,尽管比较中的靶点数量不足以使其具有统计学显著性。